![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Summary and Conclusions 118 The present s[ud" ~ " was designed If) order to evaluate effect of Diode Gallium Arsenide laser therapy (low level laser therapy) on hone regeneration in rhe midpalatal suture and evaluate its potential for redu lllg relapse after rapid maxillary expansion in patients \\ ith transv erse rnaxillary deficiencv, The stud) was carried DuI on J 8 patients (3 males and t 5 females}, \ " ~ " \\ here the sample was collected from the outpatient clinic of Faculty of Dentistry. Sua-Canal University, \\ ill! means age 12.94 ) ears ranging from 10 10 J..J years \\ uhout any congenital anomalies in the craniofacial structures Our investigation included uniform R;\U; appliance designs and activation rates. The sample was divided into two groups after termination of expansion randomly using a random number table: A. Control group (no laser treatment); included 9 patients v, 110 did not receive soft Iaver therapy after maxillary expansion, B, Experimental group (with Iase r treatment): included ) patients \\ ho received soft laser therapy after rnax diary expansion. The following record, were taken and analyzed at different lime points: 1, Postero-anterior Cephalogramswere traced and measured all patients at time pointsT, and TI_ to evaluate the efficiency ofRME, " ~ " The occlusal radiograph (topographic view) using the xame machine and same angulation for all patients ar time points T”, ’1’1. T> ”1’) and T, and analyzed u”ing linear measurements and densitometric anaiysrs , 3. The maxillary arch models for all patients at all time points L, Ti- T2- f;, I’J and T5. The iruercanine width {ICWl_intermo!ar \\ idth (l\lWI and 4. Summary and Conclusions 119 5. the palatal vault depth were measured on the models, \\ hile the palatal surface area and volume were measured from 3D laser scanned model. The foll(lwing conclusions can be draw n from the current study: l . For both lased and unlased gr()up" ~ " R\lE efficiently caused a skeletal e\pan" ~ "l()n. 1 1,0\’ intensity laser was useful in promoting bone healing following Rlvn-: at the mid-palatal suture as bone density in lased group showed " ~ "ignificanI increase starting fj-om 45 days after expansion. \\ hile in unlased group from 3 months after expansion. 3. Low intensity laser was useful in reducing the long term relapse alter expansion (’) months after evpan-ion) due to the: early high hone density at the mid palatal suture area gained by low imcnsnv laser therapy. " ~ "uggt’" ~ "tion for further inYesligalions: L To applv the LILT mer a larger sample of patieurs with rZ:v1E for longer follow -up periods 3 10 5 years after removal of fixed orthodontic appliance. 2. To studv the effect of LILT ()\ er bone regeneration after other surgical onhodontic case:” as distraction osteogenesis. orthognathic surgeries ami transplantations. 3. To apply LILT at different wiJ\c-lengths and number or applications to e\ aluatc the best inrensuy and timing of applications. 6. |