![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract A STUDY ON THE EFFECT OF SOME ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS ON mE PRODUCTIVITY OF SOME FLAX VARIETIES A field experiment was conducted in Gemmiza Agricultural Research Station in 1995/1996 and 1996/1997 seasons to study the response of two flax varieties to sowing dates, planting density and their interactions. The two varieties were : the local dual purpose variety ”Giza8” and the introduced fiber flax type ” Iriana ”, Sowing dates were: Oct.25, Nov.l5 and Dec.5. Planting densities included seeding 1125,1500 and 1875 seeds 1 m2, represented seeding rates of 45,60 and 75 kg Ifad for Giza8 corresponding to 24 ~32and 40 kg! fad for Iriana . A spilt- spilt plot design in four replications was used, the main plots were randomly assigned to the two varieties, the sub plots to sowing dates and the sub-sub plots to plant densities. Data on straw, fiber and seed yields as well as their related characters were collected. Technological characters were also considered Results could be summarized as follows : 1- Iriana variety significantly surpassed Giza 8 in plant height, technical stem length, straw yield /plant, straw yield! fad and fiber yield /fad in both seasons. On the other hand, Giza 8 was of thicker stem diameter compared with Iriana. 2- Giza 8 produced greater number of capsules!plant and more seeds number/capsules than Iriana in both seasons. On the other hand, Iriana variety significantly surpassed Giza8 in apical branching zone length in both seasons. 3- Giza 8 significantly surpassed Iriana in seed yield / plant, seed index, seed yield! fad and oil percentage in both seasons . 4- Iriana variety as a fiber flax type was superior in fiber length, long fiber percentage and fiber fineness compared with Giza 8 in both seasons. 5- Early planting of flax on Oct.25 favorably affected plant height, technical stem length, stem diameter, straw yield! plant as well as per fad, number of capsules! plant, number of seeds!capsules, apical branching zone length, seed yield! plant, seed yield fad and seed index compared with late sowing on Nov.I5 and Dec.5 in both seasons of experimentation. 6- Technological characters of fibers were positively affected by early sowing on Oct.25 where significant increases were recorded in fiber length, long fibers Percentage and fiber fineness compared with delayed sowing. 7~ Oil percentage was significantly increased by earlier sowing on Oct.25 compared with late sowing in both seasons. 8~ Increasing planting density from 1125 to 1500 and 1875 seeds! m2 significantly increased total plant height, technical stem length, straw yield /fad, fiber yield /fad and seed yield! fad in both seasons. 9- On the other hand, increasing planting density significantly reduced stem diameter, straw yield! plant, number of capsules! plant, number of seeds / capsule, seed yield / plant and seed index in both seasons. 10~ Fiber length, long fibers percentage and fiber fineness were positively affected by dense planting where significant increases were recorded due to increasing number of seeds!m2 to 1875 seeds/ m2 . On the other hand oil % was reduced due to intensive planting in both seasons. II ~ The effect of the interactions between the experimental factors significantly affected many of the studied characters as shown in tables 18 and 19 where a summary indicating the highest response Val~l s, significance and combination of factors of the interaction eff ts on the studied characters of flax in both seasons. It was evident that the best combination for producing the highest straw and fiber yiel;S of the best technological characters was achieved.by growing Iriaaa variety early on Oct2S at the highest planting density of 1875 ~ / m2 • For producing the highest seed and oil yield, the results 85 indicated that growing Giza8 variety on Oct.25 at 1875 seeds / m2 is recommended, Table (18) : Highest response value, significance and combination of factors of the interaction effects on the studied dharacters of flax in 1995/1996 season. Interactions Characters Totjd plant height (em) Variety x Dates * 98.35 Iriana, Oct.25 Variety x Density * 99.41 Iriana, 1875/m2 Dates x Density *92.61 Oct.25, 1875/m2 Variety x Dates x Density *101.85 Iriana. Oct.25, 1875/m2 Technical stem length (em) Main stem diameter (mm) * 78.95 Iriana , Oct.25 2.80NS Giza8, Oct.25 * 78.89 Iriana,1875/m2 * 2.87 GizaS ,1125/m2 * 74.36 Oct.25, 1875/m2 2.50NS Oct.25,1125/m2 * 81.90 Iriana / Oct.25, 1875/m2 2.90 NS Giza8 , Oct.25,1125/m2 Strar.v yield / plant (~) 3.29NS Iriana, Oct.25 * 3.34 Iriana, 1125/m2 * 3.11 Oct.25,1125/m2 * 3.42 Iriana, Oct.25,1125/m2 Sm w yield / fad (0 3.61 NS Iriana, Oct.25 * 3.67 Iriana,1875/m2 * 3.42 Oct.25 1875/m2 * 3.76 Iriana, Oct.25,1875/m2 Fi ~r yield! fad (kg) N”umberof cansules / plant 465.64NS Iriana, Oct.25 * 9.66 Giza8, Oct.25 * 482.52 Iriana, 1875/m2 10.12 NS GizaS,l1251m2 *425.46 Oct.25, 1875/m2 10.35 NS Oct.25,II25/m2 *501.09 Iriana, Oct.25,1875/m2 12.83NS Giza8 Oct.25,1125/m2 Number of seeds / capsule 858NS Giza 8 , Oct.25 8.11 NS GizaS. 1125/m2 8.SONS Oct.25,II25/m2 9.65 NS Giza8, Oct.25,1125/m2 Ap IcaI branching zone lenstth (an) See~ yield / plant (2) 19.65 NS Iriana, Oct.25 1.71 NS GizaS, Oct.25 *2052 ~t8751m2 <un GizaS,11251m2 * 19.38 Oct.25,11251m2 *156 Oct.25. 11251m2 * 22.16 Iriana, Oct.25,1875/m2 * 1.82 GizaS, Oct.25,11251m2 &~index(g) Sej,d yield / fad (k2l * 8.37 GizaS,Oct.25 61439NS Giza8,0ct.25 *8.27 Giza8.112S1m2 * 624.35 GizaS. 18751m2 * 7.39 0ct.2S,11251m2 58131 NS 0ct.2S,18751m2 8.39 NS Giza8, Oct.25,11251m2 * 639.45 Giza8~ Oct.25,18751m2 Iiber length 76.84NS Iriana, 0ct.2S * 72.63 0ct.2S 1875Jm2 *SO.161riana, 0ct.2S, 18751m2 F !ber fineness ,(Nm) * 13.91 Iriana , 0ct.25 *197.70 T•••••••• Dec:5 * 13.15 . IriaDa, 187S1m2 191.38NS ~ 187S/fIJ.2 * 13.31 Oct.25,18751m2 *192.06 Dec.S, 1875/m2 * 13.98 IriaDa, Oct.25,18751m2 *199.48 Iriana, Dcc.5, 1875/ni oa percri.tage (%) 42.S2NS r...i-Jil 0ct.25 * 40.41 Oct.25,1125/m2 • 42.87 GizaB, Oct.2S,11251m2 ~---+-_._- -- .__. -- ._-------------- -------~~~--------- 86 - Table (19) .. Highest response value, significance and combination of factors of the interaction effect on the studied characters of flax in 1996 / 1997 season. Interactions a aracters Variety x Dates Variety x Density Dates x Density Variety x Dates x Densitv T< tal plant * 110.79 * 114.50 * 107.93 * 117.25 Iriana, he Igbt (em) Iriana,Oct.25 Iriana, 1875/m2 Oct.25, 1875/m2 Oct.25, 1875/m2 Ted inical stem * 91.41 * 94.71 * 88.00 * 96.79 lriana leIIJnh (em) Iriana, Oct.25 lriana, 1875/m2 Oct.25, 1875/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 Main stem *3.29 *3.37 3.27NS 3.46 NS Giza8, diameter Giza8, Oct.25 GizaB,II25/m2 Oct.25,II25/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 ~m.m) Str w yield / 3.82NS * 3.84 3.63 NS • 4.01 Iriana, tllant (e;) Iriana, Oct.25 lriana, 1125/m2 Oct.25,II25/m2 Oct.25,I25/m2 Str wyield/ 4.23NS * 4.32 4.04NS * 4.45 Iriana, ~ad (t) Iriana, Oct.25 lriana, 1875/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 Fibc r yield fad • 535.11 • 535.76 * 507.89 * 580.77 Iriana, Ck2) Iriana, Oct.25 lriana, 1875/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 N ~berof 11.90 NS 13.27 NS • 13.69 16.05 NS Giza8 ca tpsules / Giza8,Oct.25 Giza8, 1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 I plant N ~berof 8.48 NS *9.32 8.44NS 9.48 NS Giza8, see<!Is / capsule Giza8, Oct.25 Giza8, 112S/m2 Oct.2S,1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 f’\Pical 19.37NS 19.77 NS 40.~NS 20.46 NS Iriana, bran chiag zone Iriana, Oct.25 lriana,1875/m2 Oct.25, 125/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 leI IJnh (em) Se p!dyield / * 2.02 * 2.11 *1.90 * 2.21 Giza8, dIant(2) Giza8, Oct.25 GizaB, 1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 Sc:ed index * 8.64 * 8.86 7.62 NS 8.87 NS GizaS, (st) GizaS, Oc:t.25 GizaS, 1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 Oct.25,1125/m2 Se ed yield/ 702.86NS * 717.97 668.47NS * 735.38 Giza8, JJut (kg) GizaS, 0ct.2S r......2.•1875/m2 Oct.25, 1875/m2 Oct.25.1875/m2 Fit~rlcDgth * 89.38 *·92.65 * 86.10 * 94.53 1riaIla, (em) Iriana, Oct.25 IriaDa, 187S/m2 Oct.25,I87S/m2 Oct.25,1875/m2 LJog fiber * 13.80 *13.27 * 13.61 * 13.94 Iriana, I:riaDa,Oct.25 Iriana, 18751m2 Oct.25,187S/m2 Oct.25,I87S/m2 Fib ~finCDess 200.57 NS *196.65 *194.89 • 201.60 Iriana. IlNm) IriaDa, Dec.5 Iriana, Ifr1S/m2 Dec.5, 187S/m2 Dec.S. 1875/nl Oil percentage 42.56NS 4241NS * 40.46 * 4294 Giza8, (lJ,) ~0ct.2S GizaB,I12S/m.2 Oct.25,112S/m2 0ct.2S,1125/m2 - - - -~- |