الفهرس 
الباب الاوليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 103 |  |  |
| | | from | 103 | | |
المستخلص
Thu migl’a tionOf ugr1cul tural le.bour 18 an 1n~porto.nt
demographic phenomena due to its clear effect on the structure
and economics of the agricultural SEictor.
Agricultural labour is particularly important for
agricultural food production in Egypt conseCluently thtit ddV- ’:”,;
’~~~
elopment and l’utionalization of agricul tura.l In,bour e:ffeciency, ,~
~ro greatly needod for higher productiVity in the ngricultu~!
”ector. particularly after tilo great economic chnngo9 occured i
.\ . ,,~
aiuc’d 1974 resultin.g in the migration of ugriculturul labor
~Ud couBidaru~le economic effects.
Ther!ore, this investigation was carried out to study and
date c t the economic eff0cts of agriculturo.l lai)or migration· .”
on cotton, wheat und mai~o production in p~rticulur and on the
put t erna ot conuuUlption uml invaLltmant 111u~ricul tural in
general.
the effect of migration on ~gricul tUl’e.l income and
wage of agricultural labour as well a13 thG important social
and economic factors influencing the migration of agriCultural ~
.’
labor are al~o cone1dared.
The problema encountered with tho migration
in \ the Egypt1~ village and the view point of the farmers thfunselves
concerning the _development of agricultural production
a.re also taken into con&:lideration.
..~
The results ot the study could be gummariz6~ as follows z-
, There is a significant rolationship at 0.01 level of probability
between migration ot agricultural 14bour and each of:
social status, 1 evel of education, profession and f’amily size •.
There ~rp significant differonco~ were found at 0.01 level
of probability between migrants and non-migrants in regard tal
social status. lcv01 of education, profession~ and family Biz~.
A significtillt relationship at 0.01 l~vel of probability was
found between m~gration of agricultural lubour und each of tbo
following econouic parfUncters: average quantity of JIlain and
tle-condury production per feddan of cottOll. whoat and maizo nnd
net aericult~ral return pur ledden of cotton, wheat and m~1ze •
.A aj,gnificant rdlationship waa found at 0.01 lavel of probabil1
ty between ’ligra tion of a.gricul tural labour and all of the
_., consumption expcnditurQ items tested oxcopt the item concerning
th!” tnrA”’f”i.x.?e of the migrant or one of his sons,
11a signific~mt :r61u.tionL:ihip was found at 0.05 lovtll of
prob&bility between micrution of ag~iculturtil lu~our ~nd one or
th<~ :Jocial oxpendi t ur-e i tt:ms, nomely, m’J,r/~Yt’ of the migrant or
ant;!o~ his sons.
Thore is a significant relationship at 0.01 l~vol of proba-
, 111ty b. tw•• n t h. nligl’”, iOI1 of agrt cuLturu:j. 1”bouz- and the agr-
~cultural wag. of migrants and nOn-migrunt.”.in the te”ted sampls.
’J’.’mhoeat important rotardant o-r tho dovulo!l~nt of tigricul-
turai production in 1985/1986 s.ason could be arranged in a _Ii
( descending order as ~ollows: A dsclin. in agricultural production,!
lack o~ hired labor , the increase in level o~ l.bor wag., incre_ ’
ase in the Coet °7 production, U””vailabiliJ.y or improved seed.•
at t.he ””t imum.’ ’,i ng de.to , delay in recei villg.:rertilizers, lack
o~ pesticides, lack o~ irrigation water, £ra8mentation or
-5-
agricultural holdings, lack of agricultural mechanization,
uuorg~nized migration, markting problems, low prices paid for
co-operative marketing, d~ficiency of extension sorvice and
limited oppurtunitiau of work in the village.
Proposals for tha developmont cf agricultural production
suggeatvd by the farmers 3ulected in the s~nple were statistically
analysed using L ..S.Do The moat important proposals were:
a vuilability of agricultural requirements, develoment of irrigation
and tile dra1nagd systems, organizing of Inigrat1on, development
of warkting ~yatdlU, development of agricultural mechanization
and adopting th8 grouping of fragmented holding into
consolidated fields to reduce tl16 costa of production and to
save time.
Tho ceLcu’l u t ion or 11:[.111 values was madu for t:~umining the
reliability of thesd propo.:3alsand e stimat their relative
1mportunce. It was concluded that eatimatad lip” value was (7.2)
which indlcuted t hat t he diff61’onCB:3 were hi~U:t significant. ”The
L.S.D. at 0.05 level of probability was (0.207) and at 0.01 level
wu~ (U.27J).
In cClcluaion, this st\ld.y did not cover the
dit~erent ~spectB of migration problema. Therefore, furth6r investigation
is needed to get more 1nfol”JUat1on concarn1ng the
positive and negative effects of the migr~tion of egri~ultural
labor and to &nsu~e the present results.