الفهرس 
الباب الثانىيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 202 |  |  |
| | | from | 202 | | |
المستخلص
Arab Republic of Egypt is one of the developing countries
which carries out plans for the development in all productive
sectors.
Various studies have proved that the development in agricultural
sectors depends among other thir~s upon agricultural
extension.
The A.R.E gives a great 1~portance for food production
in general especially cereal crops, as meat of the third world
countries of the major cereal crops prodL:.cedin Egypt.
Researeh results stabilized that there is a gap at maize
production between empiric field production and farmers field
production of Maize production, under agricultural condi t Lcn .ili.c.
Egypt,1t colild not increase an greB. tor this crop.
It’s necessary to reise the production-p~r feddan, especially
research results indicate to a chance for duplicate fedden’s
production if agricultural technology were used and suitable
extension methods.
For the researcher beleif in the necessity of shortening
the period between the avaliabi ti ty of ner.aericul t ur-al recommendation
and Te~haoloeY methods for K£ize c~op and its adoption.
Therefore it ~as necessary to study sociR1, economic
and persone..lfactors ;::ffecting the ~.dop:i:,n of the recor:u:lended
pruc t ices for ~:[’ize.
Accordingly, the objectives of the study were stated A.S
follo’i;s:
1- Determining the effect of adopting recommend Maize varietiei
on the adoption of other reGommendations of Maize
production.
2- Determining the effect of each of the following personal
.factors at the rate of farmer adclption of recommended
practices of Maize production.
Age: Eductional status, profession.
J- Determining the effect of each of the following social
Factors at the rate of adopting the agricultural recommendations
of Maize crop:
Familly type, fa.mily size, degres of participation in
local organizations, the conmopoliteness, expasure to
general mass media, degree of fatalism, innoativcess,
social status, opinion leea.dership, ’”ite EncQuragment
of planting types of’ maize and cont act with change
agen~s.
. ~
- )
4.Determinin~ the effect of e<”’lchof the follo’:ri~~ fe.ctors
!.:”. t the r8.te of f8.r’”:”’a~dero’pstion of -~he ~<~ricu1tural recor.
unendations of ;.:p:.ize crop:
Local extension sctivities end fe~crs participation
and extension incentives.
5.Determining the effect of each of the following 8cono”:
mical factors at the rate of farmers adopting the agricultural’recor.
uner:/ c i ons of Maize crop:
Farmer’~-ecooooical status, Total size of holdings,type
of holdings,Maize area, tiaize holding; aggricgates farm
livestock holdings, degree· of using maize as a animals
food, farm family employment, avai.lability of production
equipm.ent, using of Agic. Mechani~~ation, farm mechanization
holdings, average Production of Maize crop per
feeden. net-income per fedden and degree of using the
crop.
6.Studying the most i~portant difficulties facing production
of Maize crop and the possibe way’s to overcome them from
the farmer’s point of view.
To achieve these objectives five theortical hypotheses
were formulated:
1.T~.e adoption of the other s.p;ric.recO!7lT.entdiaons
for plentin~ ~~ize crop is affected by the adopt
Lng recornmended ’Je.rietiesof t:aize.
2.The degree rate of adoption of a~ric. recommendations
of llaize crop is affected by each of the
following personal factors:-
Age, Eductional status and occupation.
3.The degree rate or· adoption of Agric. recommendations
of Maize crop is affected by each at the
following social factors:-
Family type, family size, degree of: participation
in local organizations,etc.
4. The e.doption rate of Agric. recomm~ndations of Maize
crop is affected by each of the follow2ng Economical
factors:-
Yearly Total annveal income from Agricultural. and
other activities, size of holding:::!,land tennne ••
etc.
5.The adoption rate of agric. recornI::J.endation of Ue.ize
crops as affected by each of the following extensional
factors:-
a. Loc aL ex t ens Lon cc t Lvi. ties arid fe.~e:::”3 pr-ot t c t po.
tion.
b.~xlcn3ion in c~ntive8.
This study was conducted at 10 villages in Kaliobia
Governarate ,A controlled sample of 200 fa:rmers
was selected from both adoppters and non adopters
of the r-e ccrmena tion of f/!aizecrop (10 adopters and
10 non adopters) recommended varieties of Maize crop.
Data were collected through persona.l inter vie’I’Tsbased
on priviously prepared questionna.ire.
The following results were obtained:-
I.There is a positive significant relation-ship at
level of 0.05 between the adoption of the recommended
varieties and the adoption of other recot!l!i1endations
of Maize crop. - 2.a. There is a positive significant relation ship at
level of 0.05 between the adoption of agric.
recommenclations of t:aize crops and Educational status.
b.There is no significant relation-ship at 0.05 level
betwe en the adoption of agr-Lc , recornrnenations of l.~aize
crops and both of age and occtlpatioa.
3.a. There is a positive si::;nific1”.nt relation ship
of level of 0.01 b.e tvre en the occ upat Lon of
the o.,;ricula t ur-a l, r-ecoranenda tion of ~;:aize
crop and each of frequent contact -;;t1h changs
aGents degree af fatalism opinion leader ship
degree of the cosmopoliteness,innavativness,
degree of participation in local orgnizations,
and Encour~gement of pLantLng types of 1!aize
crop.
There is positive significant relation ship
at level 0.05 between the adoption of agric recommen~
ations of llaize crops Bnd A spiralion of
level.
c.There is no significant relation ship at 0.05
level between the adoption of agric. recommendations
of Maize crop and eech of Family type,
family size and social status.
4.8. There is a postive signficant relation ship at
level of 0.01 between the adoption of agric.
recommendations of Maize crop and each of farmers
economical status, total t~rpe of holding, average
Lncone l.!aize crop per feddan, Hetincome
per feddan.
1
b.~tere is a si;nificant relation -shi, between th~ c.~u.0p+l..”lOa
of ~~ric ~~commcndRtions of ~~ize ero” pod c~ch of
de;~ree of usLn.r ~:aize crop as anLriaL food, farm :C’.!:li Lv
befor usin ..?:’ ?~ri c. t!ec~-:nisat ion there is nois io;ni fi-:o.nt
relation ship at 0.05 level between the ~doption of
a c;ric r-ec onmenda tiona of LlaLze crop. and each of land
tennce Maize crop holdin~ c.GGrJgnts, farm livestock holdings,
degree of using the crop.
- 5.The is a positive significant relation ship at level
0.01 between the adoption of agric. recommendations
of ~jaize crop end bathe in local extension activities
and farmers participation ~nd extension incontives.