الفهرس 
الباب الاوليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 225 |  |  |
| | | from | 225 | | |
المستخلص
The main objective of this research were to study the
farmers adoption level of modernized agricultural
irrigational technologies and to study some factors
associated and determined their adoption levels. Specific
objectives included: (1) To determine time period of the
farmers adoption to each at technologies related to: Soil
improvement, plantation methods, irrigational performance,
irrigational tabulization and the improved surface irrigation,
(2) To determine farmers adoption rate to each practices
from the studied irrigation technologies, (3) To determine
farmers adoption level to each of the practices from the
studies irrigational technologies, (4) To determine deference
between average of degrees of farmers adoptions of each of
the studied irrigational technologies, (5) To determine
relationship between total degrees of the farmers adoption
for the studied irrigational technologies and some
independent variables, (6) To determine the independent
variables that affect total degrees of farmer’s adoption for
the studied irrigation technologies, (7) To determine the
constraints facing respondent farmers from their point of
view towards the adoption of the studied irrigation
technologies.
The necessary date were abtained by an elaborate
designed and pretested questionnaire through interviewing
(340) from operator in five village communities representing
five distrects i e kafr El- Sheikh ” Desouk Sedy - Slem,
Kellen and El - Hamoul distrets in Kafr El - Sheikh
Governorate important statistical methods used for research
data analysis included: Percentages, Simple correlation
Coefficient, multiple regression and variance analysis.
The research is composed of four chapters: the first
explains the nature and dimention of the research problem;
the second is a coverage of literature reviewed; the third
indicates methodology and research procedures; the fourth
presents the resulted and discussions. The following is a
summary of important research findings;
First: Time period of farmers adoption for
irrigational technologies:
1- Soil improving technologies; The average of time period
between hearing and adoption was 3 years from 1986 to
1996, while this average was 5 years from 1996 to 2004.
2- Agricultural practices technologies: The average of time
period between hearing and adoption was still constant at
3 years until 1998, i was reached about 6 years during
the period from 1988 until 2004.
Sltrnlnary
3- Irrigational performance technologies: The average of
time period which spent between hearing and adoption
until 1998 amounted to 3 years, while this average was 3
years from 1998 to 2004.
4- Irrigational tabulization technologies: The average of time
period spent between hearing and adoption was 4 years
from 1990 to 2004.
5- Improved surface irrigation technologies: The average of
time period spent between hearing and adoption was
about 3 years since its deffused from 1996 to 2004.
Second: farmers adoption rate of the practices
irrigational technologies: The studies rates of farmers
adoption of practices irrigational technologies can be ranked
as will as its adoption rate as follows:
a- Planting early maturing varaits and high production with
adoption rate amounted to 72.9%.
b- planting on long lines and terraces, the adoption average
was 60%.
c- Using slides when doing irrigation, adoption average was
55.9%.
d- Obligation with crops rotation, adoption average was
50.9%.
e- Land sette1ment by L. A. S. E. R., adoption average was
47.9%.
f- Sub soil blowing with adoption average was 42.6%.
g- Developed irrigation with adoption average was 42.6%.
h- Determining irrigation time period with adoption average
was 38.8%.
i- Adding agricultural gypsum with adoption average was
37.7%.
j- Nightly irrigation with adoption average was 33.8%.
k- Intercropping with adoption average was 32.7%.
L- Exchanging irrigation with adoption average was 30.3%.
m- Determining stop time irrigation processes and maturing
time of crops with adoption average was 29.4%.
n- Determining time of irrigation processes, with adoption
average was 28.2%.
0- Let out space without water irrigation at the of the field to
suck or to absorb increasing water irrigation with
adoption average was 27.4%.
p- Pulsational irrigation with an average of adoption was
25.3%.
q- plantation dry clover with adoption average was 21.2%.
r- Irrigation shiphon flo om with adoption average was
19.4%.
s- Determining amount of water irrigation needed, the
adoption average was 19.1%.
Third: Farmers adoption level for irrigational
Technologies:
a_ Adoption’s level of soil improving technologies: research
results showed that 37.6% of the interviewees haven’t
adopted soil technologies 56.2% of the interviewees SU/n tnary
have low / medium level of adoption, and 6.2% only
high adoption level.
b- Adoption’s level of agricultural practices technologies
results, cleared that 25.3% of the interviewees haven’t
adoption agricultural practices technologies; 52.1 % of
the interviewees have low / medium level of adoption,
and 22.6% only high adoption level.
c- Adoption’s level irrigation performance technologies:
research findings revealed that 31.5% of the interviewees
haven’t adopted irrigational performance technologies;
50% of the interviewees have low / medium adoption
levels; and 18.5% only of the interviewees considered
high adoption level.
d- Adoption’s level of irrigational tabulization technologies:
research results showed that 41.8% of the interviewees
haven’t adopted irrigational tabulization technologies;
40% have low / medium adoption level; and 17.6% only
high adoption level.
e- Adoption’s level of improved surface irrigation
technologies: research results pointed to 46.5% of the
interviewees haven’t adopted improved surface irrigation
technologies; 35.9% only of the interviewees have low /
medium adoption level, and 17.6% only have high
adoption level of improved surface irrigation.
f- total adoption level for all irrigational technologies:
research results cleared that 54.9% of all interviewees
Summary --
were low adoption level; 27.1% were medium, and 8%
only of the interviewees were high adoption level. It
mean that majority of he interviewees (92%) were low /
medium adoption level.
Fourth: Determining differences between average
of farmers degrees of irrigational technologies: research
results cleared that differences between average of farmers
degrees of irrigational technologies can be arranged as
follow:
1- Average of degrees of farmers adoption of agricultural
practices technologies is the first one with mathematical
mean 39.53 degrees, and the S. D. was 30.22 degrees.
2- Average of farmers adoption of irrigational performance
technologies is the second one with mathematical mean
32.49% degrees and S. D. 27.49 degrees.
3- Average of degrees of farmers adoption of soil improving
technologies is the third one with mathematical mean
29.56 degrees and S. D. 28.94 degrees.
4- Average of degrees of farmers adoption of improved
surface irrigational technologies is the fourth one with
mathematical mean 29.02 degree and S. D. 32 - 92
degrees.
5- Average of degrees of farmers adoption of irrigation
tabulization technologies is the fifth one with
mathematical mean 28.81 degrees and S. D. 30.39
degrees.
Fifth: Correlation between independent and
dependent variables:
- There was a positive and significant relationship (at level
0.01 of significances) between 23 variables and farmer’s
level of adoption of irrigational technologies, these
variables included: mass media expouser, utilizations
from mass media, sufficiency of requirement of
technologies uses, concordances between technologies,
and practices & criteria, saving efforts in irrigation
processes, saving time needed to irrigational processes,
saving total costs for irrigation processes, net return /
feddan, relative advances, landlord of agricultural land,
effective by references groups, economical values, justic
values, social values, economical motivaions, social
motivations, psychological motivation, empathy, brain
elasticaly, risk set, attitud towards rationalization of water
irrigation use, existence of agricultural organizations and
utilization from agricultural organizations serves.
- On the others hand results showed that there was a
negative and significant relationship (at level 0.01 of
significancy) between dependent and independent
variables i, e, degrees of technologies compellation.
There was a negative & positive and significant
relationship between the research variables i, e, degree of
similarity of perception of farmers recognition for the
technologies characteristics, degree of participation on
irrigational extensional irrigational activities.
Sixth: variables affecting on the adoption levels:
- The results of multible regression analysis between
farmers variables and their adoption’s levels in indicated
the following: 24 variable could explain 49.9% of
variance among interviewees with regard to their levels
of adoption of modernized agricultural irrigational
technologies.
Step - wise multible regression analysis showed that the
variable of attitude towards rationalization of water
irrigation use responsible for explianing 37.6% of total
variance between farmers, mass media exposured
explained 5.3% variance, technologies relative
advantages explained 3.1% of varience; degrees of
psychological motivation explained 1.3% of variance,
and finaly degree of existence of organizations works in
irrigation in the area explained 1% of total varience
among the interviewees.
Seventh: Problems and Barriers:
- Ten problems and barriers faced the interviewees as
follow:
1-Unsutable of technologies for the nature and charecterics
of the Egyptian farmers.
2- Unhearing about the technologies.
3- Nonexistence of the technologies requerments time and
with a suitable price.
4- Nonexistence of organizations working in the field of
irrigation in research area.
5- High expensive for technologies implementation.
6- Charg of farmers knowledge and skills for emplemntation
the technologies.
7- No - awareness of the farmers with importance of
rationalization of water irrigational use.
8- Splitting agricultural land.
9- Weakness of performance levels of extensionists.
10- No - awareness of the farmers towards adoption the
irrigational technologies in increasing production and
raising efficiency of water irrigation use.
Eight: Recommendation:
1-To integrating efforts of orgamjations and Foundation
which working the field of irrigation and securing
requirements of irrigation Technologies use.
2- To concentrating enlightenment of farmers to adopting
technologies as will as agroup to maximize there
benefites.
3- To determinate the extensional methods to be more
suitable, and to make irrigational Practices Technologies
more available to adoptive.
4- Integrating to Creating Positive attitudes towards
rationalization irrigation water use.
5- Increasing of Connecting Farmers with mass media
Communication.
6- Doing more efforts of extension work to explain and
clear the importance and benefits of modernized
innovational Technologies.
7- Presenting models of adoption farmers in each of
extension meetings to satisfy Psychological motives.
8-Deploying agricultural: organization working in the field
of fibbed irrigation between vacillates.
9- Raising efficiency of agricultural organization System,
specially the extensianists in the extensional activities.