الفهرس 
Historical reviewOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 423 |  |  |
| | | from | 423 | | |
Abstract
goals of revision arthroplasty of the hip are to relieve pain »ve function. These goals can be accomplished by insertion Aant with stable Fixation of the interface and restoration or at oration of the anatomy.
f-Inain challenge in revision hip arthroplaty is the restoration ick loss and the procedures to remove the prosthesis and he biologic approach using either autograft or allograft is an
•hnique. Autogenous bone has been shown to be superior to its ability to regenerate bone, but because of its limited potential significant donor-site morbidity, the allograft use il in the past decade^7’e is a broad agreement that the use of structural grafts on the de are associated with high failure rates as high as 47% at 10 ihould be avoided if possible.00’111 The use of impacted cancel’ious bone graft for the treatment of caviiary defects is d and the results have been universally good.
ction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty is used in cases complicated by substantial bone loss. This impacted morselUsed allograft has produced good medium-goals of revision arthroplasty of the hip are to relieve pain »ve function. These goals can be accomplished by insertion Aant with stable Fixation of the interface and restoration or at oration of the anatomy.
f-Inain challenge in revision hip arthroplaty is the restoration ick loss and the procedures to remove the prosthesis and he biologic approach using either autograft or allograft is an
•hnique. Autogenous bone has been shown to be superior to its ability to regenerate bone, but because of its limited potential significant donor-site morbidity, the allograft use il in the past decade^7’e is a broad agreement that the use of structural grafts on the de are associated with high failure rates as high as 47% at 10 ihould be avoided if possible.00’111 The use of impacted cancel’ious bone graft for the treatment of caviiary defects is d and the results have been universally good.
ction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty is used in cases complicated by substantial bone loss. This impacted morselUsed allograft has produced good medium-goals of revision arthroplasty of the hip are to relieve pain»ve function. These goals can be accomplished by insertion Aant with stable Fixation of the interface and restoration or at oration of the anatomy.
Inain challenge in revision hip arthroplaty is the restoration ick loss and the procedures to remove the prosthesis and he biologic approach using either autograft or allograft is an
•hnique. Autogenous bone has been shown to be superior to its ability to regenerate bone, but because of its limited potential significant donor-site morbidity, the allograft use il in the past decade^7’e is a broad agreement that the use of structural grafts on the de are associated with high failure rates as high as 47% at 10 ihould be avoided if possible.00’111 The use of impacted cancel’ious bone graft for the treatment of caviiary defects is d and the results have been universally good.
ction bone grafting for revision hip arthroplasty is used in cases complicated by substantial bone loss.