![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract All drugs can potentially produce untoward consequences, even when used according to recommended methods of administration. Adverse drug events are an important challenge in modern medicine. They have a considerable negative impact on both health and healthcare costs. The incidence of CADRs is estimated to be 1-2% in the general population. Newer insights have been developing in the field of factors affecting CADRs and the need for studies in the Egyptian population regarding the newer trends in cutaneous adverse effects and a comparison of the same among a large population base, including attendants of two main university hospitals. This study was thus aimed to assess the percentage of CADRs, their clinical patterns and factors affecting them, especially among two large populations including dermatology outpatients of two main university hospitals in Mansoura and Benha; and assessing them through an approach to reach a diagnosis, which is the vital pillar to manage any case of CADR. The patients were assessed through history and clinical examination. Data were collected from the dermatology outpatient clinics of Benha and Mansoura University Hospitals and the percentage of CADRs was calculated. Summary and Conclusions 88 The study included 278 patients of CADRs with 306 drugs implicated over a period of 6 months in the dermatology attendants of outpatient clinics of Benha and Mansura University Hospitals. The percentage of CADRs among dermatology outpatients was 1.1%. In this study, the number of female patients outnumbered male patients with a female to male ratio of 2:1. Seventy percent of studied patients belonged to the age group ranged from 21-60 years. There was progressive decline in the number of CADRs towards the extremes of age; 20.5% belonged to the age group ranged from 0-20 years and 9.4% aged more than 60 years. Infections (15.1%) were the commonest encountered underlying comorbid disease in this study, with increase the association of upper respiratory tract infections with maculopapular reactions. Underlying autoimmune disorders did not form a major associated disease, with only thirteen patients (4.7%) found to have such disorders. Only one patient had associated malignancy. History of atopy was present in 52.1% of cases of urticarial drug eruptions. Obesity was an important risk factor for CADRs constituting 52.5% of studied patients. The most common cutaneous adverse drug reactions seen in our patients were urticaria (25.5%), followed by fixed drug eruptions (12.60%); exanthematous drug eruption (10.79%), erythema multiforme (9.71%), drug-induced purpura (8.63%), drug-induced photosensitivity reactions (8.27%), drug-induced pigmentation (7.19%), drug-induced erythema nodosum (6.83%), and drug-induced acne (5.40%). Summary and Conclusions 011 The pattern of distribution of various rashes in this study was found most frequently to be localized (50.4%) followed by generalized (41.0%) and photo-distributed (8.6%). Most cases of the studied drug-induced pigmentations and acneiform eruptions were reported in female patients; while the number of male patients with FDE outnumbered the female patients. The mean reaction time for the various drug eruptions in this study were 1 day in urticaria/angioedema, 15 days for fixed drug eruptions, 14 days for maculopapular reactions, erythema multiforme, and Stevens Johnson syndrome, 7 days for toxic epidermal necrolysis, and 18 days for drug induced vasculitis. In acneiform drug eruptions; drug induced pigmentations; and lichenoid drug reactions, the reaction time may take months to occur. Antimicrobials were found to be the most common cause of CADRs in both hospitals, while analgesics/ antipyretics were the second culprit. When rashes were studied individually, antimicrobials were the most common cause of maculopapular reactions, fixed drug eruptions, and toxic epidermal necrolysis in both hospitals. The most common cause of urticaria was found to be analgesics/ antipyretics. Acneiform eruptions were caused by steroids in all of cases. Although fixed drug eruptions were most commonly caused by antimicrobials (especially cotrimoxazole and metronidazoles), NSAIDs was also implicated in a substantial number of cases. Drug reactions were seen mostly to orally ingested drugs, with only a few appearing after intravenous or intramuscular drug administration and |