![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The aim of cardiovascular monitoring is to warn the anesthesiologist in the OR and ICU about any early hemodynamic instability or impending circulatory failure. Cardiac output monitoring is the most reliable technique for assessing cardiovascular system. Many methods developed for cardiac output measurements, which are either invasive, minimally invasive or non-invasive. Thermodilution technique was used for many years for cardiac output monitoring as it is accurate and more popular since Swan and Ganz introduced the pulmonary artery catheter. However, this technique showed many complications, some of which may be fatal (eg. Pulmonary artery rupture). Many non-invasive methods of cardiac output monitoring have been developed in the last few years especially in advances in technology, sensor designs and interpretation of data giving these methods the advantage of being non-invasive, providing online, continuous measurements with trends to follow disease progression. Most of these techniques had been discussed during the study including: (1) Minimally Invasive monitors: a- Transesophageal Doppler b- Pulse contour and pulse power analysis c- Transesophageal echocardiography d- Partial CO2 rebreathing technique (2) Non-invasive monitors a- USCOM Summary 83 b- Thoracic Electric Bioimpedance c- Non-invasive arterial pressure analysis d- Electrical velocimetry. It is clear from this review of literature that the PAC is too invasive and carries a lot of risks and potential for serious complications. The minimally invasive and the non-invasive devices carry a much lower risk of complications but still suffer from inaccuracies and shortcomings and similar to the PAC, they still lack the impact on patients’ outcome. Unfortunately, the ideal cardiac output monitor is still illusive. Hopefully, in the near future the advances in technology will help the ideal cardiac output monitor to materialize. |