![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Risk assessment (on admission) is extremely valuable for patients with NSTEMI, for management strategy and optimization of resources. ECG is a very easy, rapid and applicable way of risk assessment and is of great value especially in developing countries with low resources. So, this study was designed for investigating the value of ST-segment elevation in lead avr in the surface ecg as a predictor of detecting left main coronary artery lesions of patients suffering from NON-ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (NSTEMI) and its relation to the severity of left main coronary artery disease. This represents an easy way for risk assessment and better management. The study consisted of 100 patients that were classified into groups according to the elevation of ST-segment in lead aVR; 1- Patients without ST- segment elevation in lead aVR or with ST-segment elevation of < 0.05 mV. 2- Patients with ST-segment elevation ≥ 0.05 mV . Patients must have had chest pain for more than 20 minutes with a significant rise in cardiac enzymes to be considered in these groups. All patients who had ST-segment elevation in leads other than aVR and V1, LBBB, previous ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, previous CABG or with pacemaker were excluded. All patients had the following: medical history taken, clinical examination, admission ECG, cardiac enzymes level measured, recording of the clinical complications and hospital outcome, echocardiography and coronary angiography done within 1 month. In this study, it was found that: Male gender and dyslipidemia were found in the aVR group while hypertension ,diabetes mellitus, smoking, and positive family history were statistically insignificant in both groups. As regard distribution of risk factors for ischemic heart disease among both groups; hypertension was present in 18 (69.2%) patients in group 1 and in 40 (54.1%) patients in group 2, diabetes mellitus was present in 30 (40.5%) patients in group 2 and 12 (46.2%) patients in group 1 .Dyslipedemia was found more evident in group 2 ,60 (81.1%) patients versus 16 (61.5%)patients in group 1, as regard positive family history for IHD it was found in 26(35.1%) patients in group 2 and in 10(38.5%) patients in group 1, while smoking was nearly equally present in the two groups, 16 (61.5%) patients in group 1 and 46 (62.2%) patients in group 2 . But none of these differences were statistically significant as shown in table 1 except for Dyslipidemia. Changes in ECG that are well-known to be of ischemic cause were closely associated more with elevation of ST-segment in aVR, especially the number of contiguous leads showing STsegment depression. And regarding the site of ST-segment depression it was found that the anterior chest leads were the site of ST-segment depression in 6 ( 23 %) patients in group 1 and in 62 (83.8%) patients in group 2, lateral chest leads were 4 (15.3%) in patients in group 1 and in 40 (54.1 %) patients in group 2 and the inferior chest leads were the site of ST-segment depression were 3 (11.5%) in patients in group 1 and in 24 (32.4 %) patients in group 2 and all these changes were statistically significant (P value is <0.001) As regard the site of T-wave inversion, the anterior chest leads were the site of T-wave inversion in 12 (66.7 %) patients in group 1 and is 12 (54.5 %) in group 2, lateral leads in 10 (55.6 %) patients in group 1 and in 10 (45.5 %) patients in group 2 and the inferior leads in 10 (55.6 %) patients in group 1 and in 8 (36.4 %) patients in group 2, but non of these differences was statistically significant (P values 0.44 , 0.53 and 0.22 respectively). In-hospital complications in the form of prolonged repeated anginal attacks, heart failure, re-infarction and death were collectively higher in aVR group with high statistical significance for heart failure, but insignificant for death , re-infarction and anginal attacks. Eight (10,8%) patients in group 2 died during hospital admission while none (0%) of patients in group 1 died, reinfarction was recorded in 6 (8,1%) patients in group 2 while non of the patients in group 1 (0%) had this complication during the in-hospital course. Prolonged or recurrent anginal attacks occurred in 58 (78,4%) patients in group 2 and in 16 (61,5%) patients in group 1, which was statistically insignificant (P value < 0.09) Just 28 (37,8%) patients in group 2 were complicated with heart failure while non (0%) patients in group 1 had been complicated by heart failure and this difference was highly statistically significant (P value <0.001) as show in table 8 Figure 9. And as a final and visual proof, angiographic survey in this study showed more angiographic lesions to be highly associated with the aVR group, and more complex and critical lesions too, which again favors the early invasive approach, with a good positive correlation between the severity of angiographic lesions and the elevation of ST-segment in lead aVR. Patients were divided according the severity of LMCA lesions to two subgroups :sub group had the lesion below 80% stenosis and another subgroup having the lesion 80% stenosis or more . Twenty eight patients (37.8%) had Left Main coronary disease in group 2 ,less than 80 % stenosis compared to 18 (75%) patients in group 1. While 46 patients (62,2 %) had Left Main stenosis more than 80% In group 2,compared to 6 patients ( 25%)in group 1, the differences between subgroups were statistically significant difference (P value <0.001) as show in table 9 figure 10. -Prevalence of non-asteal lerion is significantly more than that of the osteal lesion in both groups (p value <0.001). Osteal lesion is more prevalent in group 2 while non-osteal lesion is more prevalent in group 1(p< value 0.001). All these findings illuminated the path for new, previously neglected, easily applied and very sensitive ECG prognostic criteria. |