الفهرس 
مشكلة البحث وأهدافهيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 163 |  |  |
| | | from | 163 | | |
المستخلص
__ t•••• ’_·a..,;~
Summary
All Over The World, Water resources are source of
luxuriousness advance, Peace, Wars, Life and Death as well.
Inasmuch as the value of water DROP is vital, the strategical policies
are established.
Rationalization of irrigation water use is an important field in
the agricultural extension program which aimes to improve the
Knowledges, Skills, addition to the changes in Attituds of farmers
and they are related to Rationalization of irrigation water use.
Rationalization of irrigation water use needs a hard afforts to
chonge of farmers behaviours, Both the extension system subjected
to the ministry of agriculturatve and ministry of water resources
are responsible for all afforts concerning Rationalization of
irrigation water use, more over, the afforts which submitted by the
media and research centers.
As agricultural extension one of the” most important
non - Formal educational systems covering the countryside that
play a distinguished role in Rationalization of irrigation water use ,
in its way to attain desired changes in rural peoples knowledge,
skills and attitudes. agricultural extension’s role is no more limited
to increasing crop yielding, but exceeds that to many other fields
including.
The developing maintaining and rational use of natural
resoureces . Among the activities included in this last field,
Rationalization of irrigation water use.
No doubt, the activity of the extiension eystemare depending
on situation of mankind behaviours including Knowleges, Skills and
Attituds done to know the training needs and extension needs for all
related from workers who are dealing with water resources in the
rural region .
Because the acadimic preperation program for major
agricultural extension is not strong an one side and stoping their
-----~~ ””--- --- -- -
---
from other eide, these fore the extension trainings is a vital
component in the acadimic preperation program to be completed.
moreover, refreshment and polish of ideas which are advanced in
agriculture science for agricultural extension.
To training achieve the needed aims, they will plan well. the
plan must have a proper secintific basices . they training needs for
agricultural extension are the first because it is vital in which
depending upon the proper plan for any training program which
aimes to increase the knowleges, skills and attitud levels.
In the light of the scaricity of studies in training needs for
agricultural extension agents in the field of Rationalization of
irrigation water use ,this study was conducted to indentify the
training needs to agricultural extension.
Hence, this study aimed maninly to determine the Traaining
needs for agricultural extension agents in the field of Irrigation
water Rationalization Techniques in Kafr EL - sheikh governorate
in areas, this aim was achieved through:
1 - Identify some characteristics of respondents.
2 - Identify the need degrees
Knowledge in relation to
Water use Techniques.
the agricultural extension For
the rationalization of Irrigation
3 - Identify the attitude degree the agricultural extension in relation
to the rationalization of Irrigation water use techniqnse .
4 - Define the relationship between the need degree the agricultural
extension for knowledge in relation to the rationalization of
Irrigation water use techniquse and some personal, social and
communicational variables.
5 - Define the relation ship between the attitude degree the agricultur
al extension in relation to the rotionalization of Irrigation
water use techniq use and some personal, social and
communicational variables.
-------- - ---- ---------------y
’--
6 - Determine contribution ratio of the variables significantly
correlated with the need degree the agricultural extension for
knowledge in relation to the rationalization of Irrigation water
use techniquse in explaining the tatal variance.
7 - Determine contribution ratio of the variables significantly
correlated with the attitud degree the agricultural extension in
relation to the rationaltion of Irrigation water use techniques in
explaining the total variance.
The study covered all districts of Kafr EI - Sheikh Governorate
( I - e., ) Kafr EI - Sheikh , Desouq , Kallin , Fawai . Metobes ,
Seedi-Salem, Biella, AI-Hamoui, AI-Reiad and
Balteem ) . Arandom somple vepresenting 35 °/0 of the total
agricultural extension agents in each district amounting to 250 . Data
were collected during February and March 1999 by interviewing
respondents using a pre - Tested questionnaire.
Parsons , simple correlation coefficient, step wise, percentages
and means were used to analyze data statistically.
The main results of the study revealed that:
1 - General characteristies of extension agents :
a - Age : About 13.6 °/0 of the agents are under 39 years old,
48 °/0 of them between 39 - 46 years old and 20.4 0/0 are
over 46 years old.
b - Degree of Rurality : Around 27.2 Ok of the agents have low
degree of rurality, 13.6 °/0 have middle level, and 59.2 0;/0
have high level.
c - Degree of Agricultural experience : About 28.4 Ok of the
agents have low degree of agricultural experience, 23.2 0;/0
have middle level and 48.4 °/0 have high level.
d - Degree of Education : About 540
/0 of the agents have low
degree of education, 12 0/0 have middle level and 34 0;/0
have high level.
e _ Degree of employment experience: Around 47.2 % of the
agents have low degree of employment experience,
42.8 % have middle level and 10 % have high level.
f _ Degree of use extension activities : About 36.8 % of the
agents have low degree of use extension activities, 22 0/0
have middle level and 41.2 % have high level.
g _ Degree of Exposure to in formation sources : Around
31.6 % of the agents have low degree of Exposure to in
formation sources , 39.2 % have middle level and 29.2 0/0
have high level.
h _ Degree of Training: About 28.8 % of the agents have low
degree of training ,39.6 % have middle level and 31.6 %
have high level .
I _ Degree of Usefulness from training : Around 41.2 % of the
agents have low degree of Usefulness from training, 24 %
have middle level and 34.8 % have high level.
J Degree of Attitude towards training: About 18.8 o of the
agents have low Degree of Attitude towards training ,
39.2 % have middle level and 42 o have high level.
k _ Degree of Achievement motivation : Around 22.4 % of the
agents have low Degree of Achievement motivation ,
37.2 % have middle level and 40.4 % have high level.
I _Degree of Jop satisfaction: About 30 % of the agents have
low degree of Jop satisfaction, 52.8 % have middle level
and 17.2 % have high level.
m _ Degree of Innovativeness : Around 27.2 % of the agents
have low Degree of lnnovativeness, 48.8 % have middle
level and 24 % have high livel .
2 _ Need degree the agricultural extension For Knowledge in
relation to the rationalization of Irrigation Water use
Techniques were either moderate or relativily high.
~~ ._---_ ..~----------
o
3 _ Agricultural extension Attitude were farourable and neutral .
4 _ Need degree the agricultural extension for knowledge in relation
to the rationalization of Irrigation water use techniques
correlated negatively and significantly an 0.01 with each degree
of employment experience ,degree of Agricultural experience,
degree of use extension activities , degree of job satisfaction,
degree of exposure to in formation sources, degree of training,
degree of achievement motivation, degree of education, degree
of innovativeness . the nine variables contributed by 22.86 % ,
15.62 % ,10.76 o , 7.83 % ,5.44 % ,5.05 % ,4.42 % , 1.73 % ,
and 0.65 % respectively totaling 73.31 ?% in explaining the
variance in the knowledge degree.
5 - Agricultural extension attitude in relation to the rationalization
of Irrigation water use techniques correlated positivily and
significanlty on 0.01 with each of degree of exposure to
information sources , degree of jop satisfaction , degree of
training , degree of use exten sion activities, degree of
agricultural experience , degree of achievement motivation,
degree of education , degree of innovativeness and degree of
jop satisfaction, and correlated positivily and significantly on
0.5 with degree of attiludes to words training. the ten var.iables..
contributed by 18.57 % ,14.3 % , 10.59 % , 7.73 % , 4.18 % ,
2.44 % , 1.44 % , 0.88 % , 0.77 % and 1.68 % respectively
totaling 62.58 % in explaining the variance in. t,he attitude
degree.
------ -------------- - --- --- ---