![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The present study aimed to evaluate the two-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy compared with traditional midline ovariectomy in adult female dogs as well as evaluation of laparoscopic vasectomy compared with traditional pre-scrotal castration in adult male dogs. The present experimental study was carried out on twelve apparently healthy adult dogs of both sexes having body weights of 12 to 22 kg and age 8 to 30 months. Dogs were divided into two groups; Group (1) included six bitches, were sterilized by ovariectomy; a tr aditional midline ovariectomy (OVE) (three bitches) and two-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy (LaOVE) ( three bitches). Group (2) included six male dogs, were sterilized by castration; a traditional pre-scrotal orchiectomy (three dogs) and laparoscopic vasectomy (three dogs). After complete preparation of each animal for aseptic surgery and under the effect of general anesthesia, the traditional midline ovariectomy of the selected three bitches was per formed according to Peeters and Kirpensteijn (2011). While, two-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy of the selected three bitches was performed according to McCabe (2009). Traditional pre-scrotal orchiectomy of the selected three male dogs was performed according to Boothe (2003). While, laparoscopic vasectomy of the selected three male dogs was performed according to Mahalingam et al. (2009). Incision length, surgical time, intra-operative complication(s), especially bleeding, and healing scores [postoperative appearance of the skin incision site(s) ] of all dogs were evaluated. All dogs were subjected to laparoscopic evaluation (follow up) 1-2 weeks post- operatively to detect post operative complications. Post operative pain was evaluated by measuring of serum cortisol concentration. All collected data was analyzed statistically. Results of the present study revealed that; Laparoscopy provided a comprehensive description of the normal laparoscopic anatomy of the abdomen of the male and female dogs. The two-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy had smaller incisions length, longer surgical time, lower incision scores, and lower serum cortisol concentrations after surgery when compared with the traditional open ovariectomy. 70 Summary and Conclusion No major intra-operative complications observed in either OVE or LaOVE bitches and ovaries were excised completely. No conversion to open surgery was required in any of the laparoscopic procedures. Re-laparoscopic examination revealed no visible complications or adhesions related to LaOVE. The laparoscopic vasectomy had smaller incisions length but longer surgical time when compared with the traditional pre-scrotal castration. There was no significant difference between dogs underwent traditional castration and those underwent laparoscopic vasectomy for incision scores and serum cortisol concentr ations after oper ation at each of the time intervals. No major intra-operative complications observed in either traditionally or laparoscopic castrated dogs. Re-laparoscopic examination revealed no visible complications or adhesions related to laparoscopic vasectomy. Conclusion: Despite a significantly longer operative time, dogs treated with laparoscopic ovariectomy are seemingly experienced less postoperative pain and stress than those treated with traditional open ovariectomy. This conclusion is based on higher serum cortisol concentrations after surgery. The two-portal laparoscopic ovariectomy proved advantageous than traditional open ovariectomy in bitches as it is safe, less painful, and offered minimal invasiveness. On the contrar y, pre-scrotal castration proved advantageous than laparoscopic vasectomy in dogs. Recommendation: Laparoscopic procedures are recommended to be applied as a routine technique, when possible, in most instances according to type of operation and organ involved. |