Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Evaluating the Quality and Usability of Ismailia Canal Water and the Effect of Industrial Drainage\
الناشر
Ain Shams university.
المؤلف
Keraukose ,Gamal Abd El-Massih Yassa.
هيئة الاعداد
مشرف / هشام ابراهيم القصاص
مشرف / طه عبد العظيم محمد عبد الرازق
مشرف / عبد العزيز ابراهيم الدسوقى
مناقش / محمد السيد الننه
باحث / جمال عبد المسيح يسى قرياقوس
الموضوع
Ismailia Canal Water. Industrial Drainage.
تاريخ النشر
2012
عدد الصفحات
p.:87
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
علوم التربة
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2012
مكان الإجازة
جامعة عين شمس - معهد البيئة - Agricultural Science
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 130

from 130

Abstract

The Ismailia Caral is constructed in the years of 1858-1863. It extends for about 136 km from the river Nile at Shoubra, north of Cairo, to Ismailla city on the Suez Canal. It flows through considerable varieties of geological environs. Canal depth is 6-10 m. The study was carried out through the years, 2008, 2009 and 2010 to evaluate the quality and usability of Ismailia canal water and the effect of Industrial drainage.The Ismailia canal is the principle source of irrigation and drinking water supply for a great area of soil and number of the Egyptian citizens which extends from the source of canal at Shubra to entering. The Suez Canal province. The upstream portion of the Ismailia canal (especially from Cairo to Abu-Zabal, western side) which it is considered the study portion includes the largest industrial zones in the region (Shubra El-Kheima, Mostord stream along these and Abu-Zabal. Making field visits on extension of canal two sides to limit industrial constructions and identifying planted areas and drinking water stations found on canal two sides.
Taking different samples on extension of Ismalia canal water was done periodically before and after what are taken from drinking water stations and water produced in stations. Evaluating natural and chemical characteristics as well as heavy metals (lead, cadium and copper)in canal water occurred. Taking samples from agricultural soil irrigated from canal water. Plant samples found in irrigated lands of canal water are taken. Evaluating of soil and plants affected by irrigation water was done.
5.1 Water samples collection:
Raw Ismailia canal water samples were collected in addition, two drinking water samples were taken from El-Ameriyia drinking water station and Abu-Zahal drinking water station. from all specified, sixteen sites at 15/7/2008 was chosen.
5.1.1. Chemical analysis of irrigation water samples:
Data showed the following.
1. EC values of the Ismalia canal water from the various sites along Ismailia canal water ranged from (0.34 to 0.56 ds / m).
2. The ranged values for pH from 7.8 to 8.1.
3. The ranged values for Calcium concentration fluctuate between 1.46 to 2.46 mq / L.
4. The values of Magnesium concentration fluctuate from 0.32 to 1.05 mq / L.
5. The values of soluble Sodium concentration fluctuate between 0.97 to 1.63 mq / L
6. The values of soluble Potassium concentration fluctuate from 0.08 to 0.13 mq / L.
7. The values of soluble Sulphate concentration fluctuate between 1.16 to 2.17 mq/L.
8. The values of soluble Bicarbonate concentration fluctuate between from 1.10 to 0.1.80 mq/L.
9. The values of soluble Carbonate was observed.
10. The values of soluble chloride concentration fluctuate between 0.08 to 0.73mq/L.
11. SAR, SAR Adj and SSP values of Ismailia canal water were from 0.87 to 1.36, 1.31 to 2.05 and 27.2 to 40.0 respectively.
5.1.2. The heavy metals content of irrigation water samples:
1. Lead in irrigation water of Ismailia canal ranged between n.d to 0.07 ppm.
2. Determined Cadmium is in the water of Ismailia canal ranged between n.d to 0.40 ppm.
3. Copper in Irrigation water of Ismailia canal ranged between n.d to 0.07 ppm.
5.2 The physical analyses of Sediment samples:
There are different textural classes in the studied Sediments (Clayey, Clay Sand and Silty Clay). The average of sand varies between 7 % to 90 %, that of silt varies between 2 % to 44 % while the average of Clay varies between 8% to 59 %.
5.2.1 Chemical analyses of sediments sample:
1. EC values ranged between 0.31 and 0.71 ds/m.
2. PH values fluctuates between 5.7 and .8.1.
3. The values of soluble Calcium concentration fluctuate between 0.55 to 3.09 mq/L .
4. The values of soluble Magnesium concentration fluctuate between 0.17 to 1.77 mq/L.
5. The values of soluble Sodium concentration fluctuate between 0.44 and 1.85 mq/L.
6. The values of soluble potassium concentration fluctuate between 0.08 to 0.32 mq/L.
7. Chloride concentration values ranged between 0.15 to 2.15 mq/L.
8. The values of Sulphate concentration values fluctuate between 1.28 to 4.23 mq/L.
9. The values of Bicarbonate concentration fluctuate between 0.50 to 1.40 mq/L .
10. No carbonate concentration was observed.
5.2.2 Heavy metals in the sediments of Ismalia canal mailia canal:
The concentration of DTPA – extractable Cu, Cd and Pb of the Sediment in the chosen locations along Ismailia canal ranged between 1.80 to7.94, n.d to 0.24 and n.d to 2.46, respectively.
The concentration of total Cu, Cd and Pb were (10.0 to 49.00), (1.00 to 9.00) and (1.00 to 87.00), respectively.
5.3 The physical analyses of soil samples:
There are different textural classes in the studied Sediments (clay loam, sandy clay loom and loomy sand). The average of sand varies between 27 % to 84 %, that of silt varies between 4 % to 26 % and the average of the Clay varies between 12 % to 47 %.
5.3.1 Chemical analysis of soils samples:
1. EC values Ranged between 0.30 to 0.54 ds/m.
2. PH values fluctuate between 7.5 to 7.8.
3. The values of soluble Calcium concentration fluctuate between 0.36 to 1.91 mq/L .
4. The valuesof soluble Magnesium concentrationvalues fluctuate between 0.27 to 1,31 mq/L .
5. Soluble Sodium concentration values fluctuate between 0.35 to 0.97 mq/L .
6. The values of potassium concentration fluctuate between 0.03 to 0.23 mq/L where soluble Potassium represents the lowest amount of soluble cations. Also , all soluble cations tend to increase with the increase of drainage water ratio in the mixed water of Ismailia canal water.
7. Soluble Chloride ranged between 0.08 to 0.69 mq/L.
8. The values of Sulphate concentration fluctuate between 0.56 to 2.45 mq/L.
9. Bicarbonate concentration values fluctuate between 0.50 to 1.30 mq/L.
10. The values of Carbonate concentration fluctuate between ND to ND mq/L.
5.3.2 Cu, Cd and Pb in the siols under study:
1. Avarage values 0f available Pb were n.d, 0.90, 1.60, 0.48, 1.02, 2.96, and n.d ppm in the sites 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16, respectively.
2. Available Cd were (0.0 4, 0.04, 0.06, 0. 04, n.d, 0.06, and 0.04ppm) in the sites (9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16 respectively.
3. Avarage values of available Cu were 2.40, 9.42, 13.12, 5.92, 36.42, 6.08, and 3.10 ppm in the sites 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, and 16, respectively.
4. The values of total Pb. ranged from 19.00 to 60.00 ppm in different locations of the Soil profiles surrounding the different locations -The concentration of total Soil Cd in different locations along Ismailia canal ranged between 7.00 to 11.00 ppm. The concentrations of soil Cu in different locations along Ismailia canal ranged from 15.00 to 189.00 ppm.
5.4 Heavy metals content of studied plants:
1. The concentration of Copper, Cadmium and lead in the Cabbage Leaves 5.0‚ 11.0 and n.d ppm
2. The concentration of Copper, Cadmium and lead in Melakhih Leaves was 3.0, n.d and n.d ppm.
3. The concentration of Copper, Cadmium and lead in the Pepper fruit was 8.0, 147.0 and 4.0 ppm
4. The concentration of Copper, Cadmium, and lead concentrationin guava fruit was 5.0, 56.0 and n.d ppm
5. The concentration of Copper, Cadmium, and lead in the egg apple fruit was 3.0, n.d and n.d ppm
6. Copper, Cadmium, and lead concentration in corn Grains was 8.0, 15.0 and 6.0 ppm
7. The concentration of Copper, Cadmium and lead in the Egyptian potato tuber was 7.0 , 35.0 and 4.0 ppm
5.5.1. Chemical analysis of drinking water samples:
1. EC value of Ameriyia drinking water was 0.35 ds / m while that of Abo – Zabal drinking water was 0.36 ds/m. Such EC values were in normal range.
2. pH values were 7.8 for both stations, such values were in the normal range. Also, the dominant cation of water samples collected from Ameriyia drinking water station were Calcium followed by Sodium then became Magnisium. While the dominate anions was Sulphate followed by Bicarbonate then become Cloride .The values of K, Na, Mg , Ca , SO4, CL, HCO3 and CO3 were 0.08, 1.22, 0.58, 1.55, 1.88, 0,15 1.40 and n.d mq / L , respectively. The values of SAR, Adj SAR and SSP were 1.18, 1. 78 And 35 respectively. On the other hand, ions values of water sample collected from Abu – Zabal drinking water station (K, Na, Mg, Ca, So4, CL, HCO3 and CO3) were .0.10, 0.88, 0.46, 1.82, 1.21, 0.35, 1.70 and ND mq /L. Also, the values of SAR, Adj SAR and SSP were 0.82, 1. 24 and 27.0. respectively.
5.5.2. Heavy metals content in drinking water:
1. The level of Lead determined in both of Ameriyia drinking water station and Abo – Zabal drinking water station collector was 0.6 and 0.02 ppm, respectively it is normal range.
2. The concentration of Cadmium determined in the water of Amairyia and Abo– Zabal drinking water station collector were found to be 0.82 and 0.34ppm , respectively,where are in the normal range.
3. The concentration of Copper determined in the water of Ameriyia and Abo–Zabal drinking water stations collector were found to be 0.02 and 0.05 ppm r espectively , where are in the normal range.