![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract it is well known that blood e\Jsl.I~(.J-.hils are inr;re”lsed in most helminthic infections. .rhe ubje~ti’fe 0:: ti~lis \?ork was to stud;y {IV what exteut couli blood eosillol,hlliH ’Je used in the diagnosis of intiest;J.nal Hnd UrirH-1r./ l-telminth.lClsi::J. One hundred and foul’ cases sufferins from different helmintJhic I nrec tJions were studi ed, ’;n38s auffe r i n.: l”rom helminthiC infec t Lons and 311Y 0 t her cause t ha t IDoY 1e~d tv eosinophilia were excluded from the present s~udy. A case she e c was desir;np.d co cover t he aspcc;ts ol’ ;;f~rsonal hi s c•).l.’Y, comploint, present hi:;Lory, past hi SLo[’y and clinical exaillina~lons (chest, heart and abdomen) • .the fo11owinS investiGations were done to every patient: 1- Urine examination and eGg counting by sedimentati0n and c euur ifuga cion. 2- Stool examination by direcc smear me~hod, hiche techrdque and ee;g countiini:j for cases ’:ii ch Sr;histosuma ~~ by Kato technique and fu.c c a ae s ”,ith Asr;aris lumbricoi!ies and Ancylos~oma duoden~le oy ~tioll’s tier;hnique. 3- Differentiial Leuccc yve count. |