الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract INTRODUCTION In principle, three classes of methods exist for solving the problems of forecasting water flow in ground. These three methods are:- (a) Analytical methods. (b) Methods based on the use of models and analogs. (c) Numerical methods. Analytic::al methods are superior to any of the other ones and should be used whenever possible. But unfortunately, in most regional studies of practical interest an analytical solution is not possible, n~,ainly because of the irregular! ty of the shape of aquifer boundaries. Further11,c,re, in most cases, the considered aquifer flow domain is inhomogeneous with respect to its storativity and transmissivity and the spatial distributions of these poranJ...:;ters cannot tt: [..-.Lt:st:nted in the form of anc2.ytical expressions. This is true fer ini Lial cc..ndi tions as well as for various i~~~t~ and outpL~~ (natural repien1stment, artificial recharge, aJ.~ pu~ping). Analog ~e:~:ds rr.ay be rega~d~j 65 specia2 ~urpose computers, when ccmpared to digital comp~ters. An analcg is usually constructed to solve a particular flow probJ..em, on the condition t..Lat the geo111etry and parameters or an aquifer remain unchanged. The flow through porous media can be studied by means of the following models a11d ~nalogs:- (a) Sand box model. (b) V0rtical and horizontal Hele-Show analogs. (c) E”ectric analogs c.f the electrolytic tank type, of the |