الفهرس 
Socioeconomic impact on female sterilizationOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 138 |  |  |
| | | from | 138 | | |
Abstract
Snrmnary
Evaluation of different methods of sterilization
in the department of obstetrics and gynecology Ain Shams
University.
Female sterilization is one of the old method o£
sterilization depending on bloc!d.ng or cutting of both
fallopian tabes so that the spern can not reach the ovum.
In the 19th and early 2Cith centuries it was a major
o;;>eraticm. involving all the hazards of abdominal surgery
and requiring days of hospital stay and weeks of convalecence
•
rnere are ~’Y methods of sterilization three of
them have bean practiced L-:: O’.!r hospital since last year.
Minilap sterilization lOC cases, Yoon band laparoscopic
sterilization 100 cases vaeinal sterilization sterilization
25 cases also included in tile study 64 private cases
of vaginal sterilization done by the senior supervisor
of the thesis.
The work is retrospective !L<d prospective comparative 1. The mea.’1 age of women undergoing Minilaj:
2.
3.
4.
tion is ?~ 04 lapa.r · ~~-- oscop~c sterilization
vaginal sterilization 34.96 the mean age
cases of vaginal sterilization is 32.34.
The mean parity of Hospital cases is ovel
private cases is 3.83
The grandrnultipara constitute 64% g
cases and 21.8% in private cases •
The
and
young grandmultipara are 20-40%
only lQ • 9% in privat:: cases.
7S%
in ho
:; • Parity 3· 4 are 2l-34%o in . hospital cases ar
private cases.
6. ratio is over 1 in a 11 hospital cases.
7. The Mean ·-’L nuwuer of living c~uldren is just
all hospital cases and 2.22 L• private cast
8. 83% of hospital cases were illiterate none
private group.
112.
study of t:he three techniques :..nalysis used will include
comparizon regarding.
I. Socially
rige, occupation religion level of education number
of children whether male or females.
;.ny indication for sterilization apart from social
on~ • ~neral health, rheumatic heart kidney troubles
Diabetes, etc ••••...•.••
?rcvious abdominal and vaginal surgery.
III. 2ur;ical
Type oE anaesthesia, sur§:”ical time, level of the
s~gcon detalis of each sur~ical techniques difficulties
~•d cmupiications durir~ the operation. Hospital stay
folL:J”” up and failures.
Comparison between the ::· techniques and the results
reported £rcr.:u other areas of the world.
Tne following results are o~tained 15. Failur
and mi:
16. There
0 ”·
10.
114.
:::2% of hospital cases were house wives 65.6% of
the private group •
The mea.r.. surgical time in minutes Minilap 21.6 ,
laparoscopy 10.9, vaginal sterilization 22.3,
private cases of vaginal sterilization 11.5.
11. The wean hospital ste~’ :.n days minilap 1 • .::’~-, lzparoscopy
8.2S, vaginal sterilization, 1,30 and for privete
group 1,
12. i:ieo:’..cal conditinn associa::ed with minilap G% , lao-aros-
copy 1.. . •_’’%, , vagsterJ•. 1 u. at:;_. oE -’ d . h . ~,,,a~ WJ.t _ pr1vate &roup
2.1.c:z.
13. Th:: :ClOSt common diff:.c:1lt:· i~ mi~ilap was obesity,
for vaginal and laparoscopy was adhesions.
lL:. The <nost co!IIIlon post oper2tive complication was
wound infection in minila? and laparoscopy, and
dyspareunia in v~inal st3rilizetion, some menstrual d:’..sturbance was preser.t L:1 the 3 techniques.