![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract In the present study, chitosan was successfully modified to PAN-g-CCS which was modified to both PEI-g-CCS and TETA-g-CCS. These modifications have been proved by several tools such as FTIR. TGA, Elemental analysis, SEM, TEM and ICP. In the present study, chitosan was successfully modified to PAN-g-CCS which was modified to both PEI-g-CCS and TETA-g-CCS. These modifications have been proved by several tools such as FTIR. TGA, Elemental analysis, SEM, TEM and ICP. In the present study, chitosan was successfully modified to PAN-g-CCS which was modified to both PEI-g-CCS and TETA-g-CCS. These modifications have been proved by several tools such as FTIR. TGA, Elemental analysis, SEM, TEM and ICP. In the present study, chitosan was successfully modified to PAN-g-CCS which was modified to both PEI-g-CCS and TETA-g-CCS. These modifications have been proved by several tools such as FTIR. TGA, Elemental analysis, SEM, TEM and ICP. In the present study, chitosan was successfully modified to PAN-g-CCS which was modified to both PEI-g-CCS and TETA-g-CCS. These modifications have been proved by several tools such as FTIR. TGA, Elemental analysis, SEM, TEM and ICP. In the present study, chitosail was success~illly modified to PAN-g-CC’S which was modified to both PEI-g-CCS and TETA-g-CCS. These modifications have been proved by several tools such as FTIR. TCJA. Elemental analysis, SEM, TEN and ICP. Both chitosan and ~nodi tied chitosan were tested fbr adsorption ol’heavy metals such as Ag(li, Pb(ll), Cu(l1). Ni(l1) and Mn(l1). It was found that there was a selectivity for metals by the polyner and modified polymers. where the best modified polymer- for adsorption ofAg(I). Mn(l1). Pb(1l) and Ni(l1) was TETA-g-CCS, whereas for Cu(I1) was PEI-g-CCS. |