![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Summary Patients presenting with recurrent head and neck cancer in a previously irradiated field present a therapeutic challenge. Salvage surgery, if feasible, represents the preferred treatment option. Reirradiation with or without chemotherapy has become an accepted alternative to chemotherapy or supportive care in unresectable disease and may offer long-term survival for selected patients. The role of re-irradiation in the treatment of recurrent and new primary cancer of the head and neck is controversial. Although historically avoided owing to concerns of serious complications, several reports have demonstrated that re-irradiation is feasible and effective in carefully selected patients using a variety of techniques and fractionation schedules. However, multiple unanswered questions persist regarding the appropriate selection criteria and therapeutic decision making. Although recent data are encouraging, the heterogeneity of the published trials with respect to the selection criteria and treatment details make drawing conclusions challenging. Decisions regarding reirradiation to the head and neck must be carefully individualized considering the plethora of practical issues. It is also likely that with additional advances in technology Summary and Recommendations ٢٢٥ and continued understanding of the normal tissue and tumor responses to radiation, the patterns of care will continue to evolve (Allen et al., ٢٠١١). More importantly, the results indicate that postoperative chemo-re-irradiation significantly improves loco-regional tumour control among patients at risk for a second failure. Therefore, postoperative (chemo-) reirradiation should be considered in these cases, in particular given the very low locoregional control rate after salvage surgery alone which was only ٢٠٪ at ٢ years. However, in the light of the high rate of late toxicity, the exact postoperative regimen in the re-irradiation setting requires further optimization, e.g., by optimizing the fractionation schedule and radiation technique and/or the addition of biological targets such as EGFR-inhibitors, that do not interfere with radiation-induced side effects. New radiation techniques (IMRT/IGRT and SBRT) and re irradiation studies with molecular targeted therapies could offer the possibility of greater disease control with less toxicity. Identification of the molecular mechanisms contributing to the pathogenesis and therapeutic resistance of HNSCC in recurrence settings is crucial for developing more effective re-irradiation protocols. New studies are being conducted that could offer encouraging approaches in the near future. Final suggestions to further improve in this field are described in (Bentzen et al., ٢٠١٠). In addition, advanced radiation techniques, such as tomotherapy or proton-beam therapy, may facilitate treatment near the base of skull. |