الفهرس 
Cesarean SectionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 155 |  |  |
| | | from | 155 | | |
Abstract
Cesarean section remains by far the most common surgical procedure performed for female population, and for sure post-operative pain is an issue that matters most. In fact, post-operative pain may be one of the main reasons patients may refuse to do cesarean section. Post-operative analgesia can be provided for the patients in many forms starting from simple parenteral analgesics as NSAID’s and paracetamol up to neuraxial narcotics. Many local techniques have been developed to alleviate post-operative pain, tranversus abdominis plane block is a relatively newly technique that was introduced to control pain after abdominal surgeries. TAP block can be done either transcutaneous using anatomical landmarks or ultrasound guided, or can be done by open surgical technique as described in our study.
Aim of the work:
Study the analgesic effect of the surgical transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block as regard the pain score in the post-operative period in patients undergoing cesarean section.
Objectives of this study:
- Primary objective: assessing the pain score in the postoperative period either with or without the surgical TAP block.
- Secondary objectives: assessment of:
• Postoperative nausea and vomiting in both groups.
• Early ambulation.
• Required doses of opioid analgesics and their adverse effects.
• Possible complication(s) for the surgical TAP block, for example hypotension, arrhythmia or anterior abdominal wall hematoma.
Patients and methods:
The current study included 100 women undergoing cesarean section. The patients were randomized in 2 groups, group 1, who received surgical TAP block in addition to conventional analgesia (cases) and group 2, who received conventional analgesia plus placebo (control group). The cases received surgical TAP block by the end of cesarean section after closure of the uterus (bupivacaine 0.25%) in addition to the other conventional analgesics to control post-operative pain. Control group received placebo in the form of 20 ml of normal saline injected in the transversus abdominis plane on both sides. Comparison between the two groups included post-operative pain scoring using visual analogue scale at 6, 12 and 24 hours, post-operative nausea and vomiting, side effects of the local anesthetic “bupivacaine” (pruritus, hypotension or arrhythmia), early ambulation and the required doses of opioid analgesia.
Results:
The pain scores at 6 hours during rest in the surgical TAP group ranged between 40-54 mm, while in the control group, the pain scores ranged between 49-57 mm, with p-value <0.001, the difference as noted is statistically significant. Observing pain scores at 12 and 24 hours during rest showed no clinical or statistical difference. The post-operative pain scores during movement at 6 hours in the surgical TAP group ranged between 44-58 mm, while in the control group ranged between 53-61 mm, with P-value <0.001. Pain scores at 12 hours also showed statistical difference (p-value<0.010) with pain scores ranging between 24-33 mm and 22-27 mm in the TAP and control groups respectively. Lastly, pain scores at 24 hours showed no difference between both groups. As regard opioid consumption post-operatively, 11 women from the TAP group requested 1 dose (100 mg) of intramuscular pethidine compared to 21 women from the control group. Furthermore, six cases requested 2 doses (200 mg) of pethidine, two cases in the control group and four cases in the TAP group. Post-operative nausea and vomiting occurred in six women from the TAP group compared to nine women in the control group. No other side effects related to the injection of local anesthetic including pruritus, hypotension, arrhythmia or hematoma formation were noticed in both groups.
Conclusion:
We concluded in our study that surgical TAP block has provided better post-operative pain relief in the early post-operative period, and also decreased opioid consumption.