![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of undifferentiated bone marrow stem cells, biogen bone graft material and collagen scaffold on the healing of periapical bone defects in dogs. This study included 16 Canaan dogs of both sexes. In all dogs both sides of the mandibles were used. One defect was created on each side, with a total of 2 defects bilaterally in each dog properly in the 4 th premolar region. Lateral radiographic views were taken for each dog preoperatively in order to exclude any dog with apical radiolucency and to estimate the length of the roots. Radiographs were performed under heavy sedation. The dogs were anaesthetized. Full thickness mucoperiosteal flaps were performed. Proper reflection and elevation of the flaps were done. A total of 32 bone defects were created to expose the periapical area of each root apex. Dimensions of the defects were standardized (15 mm length x 10 mm width x 10 mm depth). Root end performed on all roots included in the defects. A 3 mm root end cavity was performed. All the retrograde cavities were filled with white MTA. The bony defects were divided into 4 groups (n=8) according to the tested material. group I: Bone defects were filled with the collagen scaffold; CollaCote. Group II: bone marrow aspirates were obtained from the iliac bone of four anesthetized dogs. Bone marrow aspirates were diluted with phosphate-buffered saline and mononuclear cells were isolated by density gradient centrifugation. The bone marrow mononuclear cells were washed, counted, loaded into the collagen scaffold and then placed into the bony defect. group III: Bone defects were filled with the Biogen bone graft material. group IV: Bone defects were left to heal spontaneously (negative control). The flaps were repositioned in place after placement of the materials and sutured. The dogs were sacrified after 4 months. After the animals were scarified, skin and subcutaneous tissue were stripped off; the mandibles were disarticulated, split and the mandibles were fixed in a 10% formalin solution. resection was Evaluation of healing of the periapical bone defects was done through: Radiographic analysis: All the split mandibles were submitted for CBCT to measure the surface area and the volume of the residual bone defects. Histologic analysis: For histological assessment of healing, the split mandibles were cut in blocks and prepared for staining. Sections were sliced through the center of each block, and then the sections were stained with: 1- Hematoxylin and Eosin stain for assessment of inflammatory cell count. 2- Goldner Tri-chrome stain for assessment of percentage of bone formation and then observed under light microscope. Then, CBCT surface areas and volumes of the residual bone defects, inflammatory cells and percentage of bone formation were reported for data analysis. The results of this study showed that for the surface area of the residual bone defects, the bone marrow mononuclear cells and biogen groups showed statistically significantly lowest mean surface area values. There was no statistically significant difference between them. Collagen scaffold group showed statistically significantly higher mean surface area values. The control group showed the statistically significantly highest mean surface area. For the volume of the residual bone defects, the bone marrow mononuclear cells group showed the statistically significantly lowest mean volume. There was no statistically significant difference between collagen scaffold and bone graft groups; both showed statistically significantly higher mean values. The control group showed the statistically significantly highest mean volume. For the inflammatory cell count, the bone marrow mononuclear cells group induced the least inflammatory response followed by biogen bone graft then collagen scaffold and then the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups. For the percentage of bone formation, the bone marrow mononuclear cells group induced the highest percentage of bone formation followed by biogen bone graft then collagen scaffold and then the control group. There was a statistically significant difference between the groups. |