![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remains one of the principal causes of death around the world. Early diagnosis is of great importance in the ED to ensure early effective treatment. The gold standards for the diagnosis of AMI are ECG and determination of serum cTn concentration, which complement clinical assessment. Cardiac troponin is superior to other biomarkers available for AMI diagnosis, including myoglobin and CK-MB. However, ECG is of little help in ruling out of AMI in 20-30% of patients with AMI as no significant ECG changes are detected in those patients despite the presence of ongoing acute cardiac ischemia. Moreover, ruling out of AMI is still a demanding point of interest especially within the early hours of myocardial injury, in the so-called ‘troponin-blind period’. This is due to the fact that cTn levels do not increase during the first few hours of AMI. Therefore, the ruling out of AMI requires monitoring of patients between 6 to 9 hour period and serial blood sampling for measurement of cTn concentration. Thus, many biomarkers are being evaluated, alone or in combination with cTn for enhancing the early diagnosis of AMI with higher sensitivity. In this regards, markers with pathophysiologic background independent of cell necrosis might improve rapid diagnosis of AMI, including Copeptin. Copeptin as a marker of acute stress, is excreted into circulation independent of necrosis of cardiac cells in cases of AMI. Also, inadequate filling of the left ventricle caused by AMI stimulates cardiac baroreceptors or causes direct damage to baroreceptors which subsequently leads to AVP and Copeptin secretion from the posterior pituitary gland. Copeptin rises early at a time when other biomarkers are still undetectable. In this regard, our study aimed to examine the role of serum Copeptin in enhancing the sensitivity of cardiac troponin during the early hours of admission of ACS patients in emergency department. For this purpose, we recruited fifty (50) subjects including: forty (40) patients who presented to ED in AinShams University Hospital complaining of chest pain and were highly suspicious to have acute cardiac ischemia, in addition to ten (10) subjects serving as a healthy controlgroup. Patients were classified into fifteen (15) patients with UA and twenty five (25) patients with AMI. All participants were subjected to routine investigations as (fasting blood glucose, fasting lipid profile, kidney function tests and liver function tests), specific investigations as cTnI, Total CK and CK-MB, in addition to serum Copeptin assay by ELISA technique. Both serum cTnI and serum Copeptin were measured twice; at 3 hours and then at 6-9 hours from admission time. Results of the current study revealed that median serum levels of Copeptin in AMI group showed highly significant increase in the first sample (3hours) than the second sample (6-9 hours). While the median serum levels of cTnI and CKMB showed a highly significant increase in the second sample (6-9hours) than the first sample (3hours). A remarkable finding was that there was a highly significant difference in serum level of Copeptin observed in AMI group when compared to UA in the first sample. While the median serum levels of cTnI and CKMB showed a non-significant difference in AMI group when compared to UA in the first sample. This augments the theory that the Copeptin rises early at a time when other biomarkers are still within normal range. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was applied to assess the diagnostic performance of Copeptin for discriminating AMI group from UA group in the first sample. The best cut-off point was150 pg/mL. At this cutoff level, the sensitivity was 100%, specificity of 100%, PPV100%, NPV100% and AUC was 1.0. While in the second sample, the best cutoff level of Copeptin was 40 pg/mL. At this cutoff level, the sensitivity was 96%, specificity of 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 93.7% and AUC was 0.98. Another ROC curve analysis was applied to assess the diagnostic performance of cTnI for discriminating AMI group from UA group in the first sample. The best cut-off point was 12.6 pg/mL. At this cutoff level, the sensitivity was 92%, specificity 46.67%, PPV 74.2%, NPV 77.8% and the AUC was 0.669. While in the second sample, the best cutoff level of cTnI was 47.8 pg/mL at which 100% of the AMI patients can be diagnosed correctly and no false positive. At this cutoff level the sensitivity was 100%, specificity 100%, PPV 100%, NPV 100% and the AUC was 1.0. In conclusion, the present study indicates that determination of Copeptin as a single marker in early diagnosis of AMI has diagnostic value being superior to aconventional cTn-I within the first three hours after acute chest pain but still single Copeptin determination is unable to displace or challenge a serial cTn-I measurement to detect myocardial necrosis within a rule-in approach. The improvement in the early diagnosis of AMI offered by Copeptin testing may have the potential to improve prognosis of cases with AMI, as they would be early managed. In addition, by showing a role in ruling out AMI, Copeptin can improve allocation of resources in the ED and markedly reduce total treatment cost. Copeptin is considered to be an important biomarker in diagnosing AMI which should be applicable in the daily work not only the experimental field. |