الفهرس 
مقدمةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 175 |  |  |
| | | from | 175 | | |
المستخلص
The disciplinary responsibility of judges is every act or omission which lacks the legal basis of deliberate mother was wrong, come out whereby a judge for the requirements of his job, which is an infringement and violation of the dignity and honor and its secretariat, the will of the conscious aware during the exercise of that function or abroad programs address a competent disciplinary authority to initiate its terms of reference disciplinary when the corners and completed its elements, and thus it is not accountable to the judge for every mistake there is a positive errors disciplinary responsibility and there is a positive to this responsibility errors. Thus, the disciplinary responsibility of judges is based on two pillars only two, the physical act and what it represents the concrete manifestation of the disciplinary error and will sinful wrong key components presidents of that responsibility. It is worth mentioning that Iraqi legislation and the process of the Egyptian judiciary stipulates several measures taken by the competent authority and discipline Kalthakiq trial, moreover approved for judges with legal guarantees. As for the disciplinary punishment of judges are judicial procedures established by the organization for the job laws, signed by the competent disciplinary authority in accordance with legal regulations prescribed, and it has a moral or material nature. As it determined by the implications of the disciplinary responsibility of judges, including those affecting the judicial function in its own right, including the respect of dependency effects that affect that functionality, including those related entity acting against the moral of the judges. On this basis, we had to search in the disciplinary system for judges, and stand on all matters relating to disciplinary their responsibilities, starting with the definition out and distinguish them from others, and it was important to indicate what disciplinary error and manifestations and its standard regarding judges, then the competent authority Ptodibam, and his legal texts of the Organization for bodies judicial guarantees of disciplinary, administrative or quasi were administrative or judicial, to the punishment resulting from that error.