![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Neurological involvement in Behcet’s Disease (BD) that used to be considered uncommon seems to be frequent and may antedate other typical features of the disease. It has been therefore, suggested that it should be added to the new diagnostic criteria for BD. When neurological complications are present, morbidity and mortality rates rise, and before the advent of cytotoxic immunosuppressive therapies, death frequently occurred within one ye~ from the onset of neurologic signs. It’s not known if subclinical neurological affection demonstrated by EP s or MRI carries the same serious prognosis as overt cases, but this assumption seems feasible and justifies searching for such subclinical lesions. Therefore, early diagnosis and aggressive treatment is essential m reducing or preventing progression of CNS disease. Any part of the neuraxis may be involved and there is no characteristic clinical pattern of the disease. Like the pathological and morphological findings, laboratory, standard radiological and EEG studies are normal or show no specific changes. We tried to explore the potential usefulness ofMRI and EPs namely (BAEP & SEPs)as regards early and objective demonstration of clinical and subclinical CNS involvement in a group of 20 BD patients with and without CNS involvement seen at Ain Shams University Hospital, Ain Shams Specialized Hospital and Al-Maadi Military Hospital The results of this study showed that EP s and MRl can provide a quantitative evaluation and be objective measures in cases of BD with neurological involvement and for early detection of the lesions. The frequency of CNS involvement in our sample of patients was six patients (30%), five of them (83.3%) had abnormal MRI pattern, two had abnormal BAEPs (33.3%), two had abnormal tibial nerve SEPs (33.3%) and three had abnormal median neve SEP (50%). Interestingly, MRl disclosed subclinical findings in three patients out of the fourteen who were clinically neurologically free (21.4%) indicating CNS alterations while BAEPs were abnormal in six patients(42.8%), median as well as tibial nerve SEPs separately were abnormal in only two patients(14.4%). In addition, combining the results ofEPs modalities using (BAEPs and SEPs) showed abnormal results in all the six patients with neuro-Behcet’s disease (I 00%) and in seven patients who were clinically neurologically free (50%) with an overall diagnostic sensitivity of 65%. Moreover, combining EPs and MRl findings showed that MR images were normal in eleven patients who were clinically neurologically free, whereas EPs showed abnormalities in five of them. On the other hand, EPs normal in one out of the eight patients who had visible MRl abnormalities. It is suggested -therefore- that BAEP & SEPs together with MRI technique be applied to all patients with BD with or without CNS disease as they are useful for quantitative evaluation of neurological involvement and for assessment of areas currently not optimally imaged by MRI. Consecutive MRI studies are necessary to appreciate the effects of treatment on abnormal imaging. In addition, we recommend conducting a study of brain magnetic stimulation to look for and evaluate central motor conduction abnormalities and the degree of their prevalence in patients with BD. |