Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
أثر اختلاف أنماط دعم الأداء الإلكتروني على تحصيل المفردات اللغوية لدى التلاميذ المعاقين سمعياً /
المؤلف
بشار، شرين عوضين محمد.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / شرين عوضين محمد بشار
مشرف / الغريب زاهر إسماعيل محمد
مشرف / عصام محمد زيدان
مشرف / أمين صلاح الدين يونس
مناقش / طارق علي حسن الجبروني
مناقش / رشا أحمد إبراهيم السيد
الموضوع
اللغة العربية - دراسة وتعليم. تقييم الأداء. التحكم الإلكتروني.
تاريخ النشر
2018.
عدد الصفحات
255 ص. :
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
تكنولوجيا التعليم
تاريخ الإجازة
01/03/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية التربية - تكنولوجيا التعليم
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 255

from 255

المستخلص

The aim of this study is to study the impact of different types of electronic performance support on the achievement of vocabulary in students with hearing disabilities. The research problem was presented, its importance, its mandate, methodology, tools, and steps. The theoretical foundations of the research were presented in five axes: the first axis: electronic performance support system, the second axis: vocabulary, the third axis: the hearing impaired, The researcher used the descriptive and quasi-experimental design approach, through the application of a proposed outline by the researcher. The research procedures also included the selection of a sample of (16) ) Pupils of the raw class And the sample was divided into two experimental groups with the pre and post measurement. The intrinsic e-performance support was applied to the first group, while the extrinsic e-performance support was applied to the second experimental group. The measurement instrument was in the achievement test. Using statistical programs for social sciences (SPSS), the study found that there was a statistically significant difference between (0.05) between the average grade levels of the students of the two experimental groups in the tribal applications and the deviation in the achievement test of the linguistic vocabulary in favor of the remote application There is also a statistically significant difference at (0.05) between the average grade of students (the first experimental group) using the internal electronic performance support model, and the average grades of students (second experimental group) that use the e-performance support model in the remote application in the achievement test For the first experimental group.