الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract According to the WHO there are 185 million people infected with HCV in the world. Egypt has the highest prevalence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) in the world reaching 13% equating to an estimated 12 million Egyptians . HCV is one of the main causes of liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. HCV can develop kidney disease because of extrahepatic manifestations of HCV or as a disease process independent of the HCV infection.In addition, hemodialysis has been a risk factor for acquiring HCV infection. The prevalence of HCV infection is high in patients with ESRD, on hemodialysis ranges from 6% to 60% in different parts of the world. Several studies show that patients on hemodialysis have an increased overall mortality risk if they have chronic HCV when compared with those on dialysis who do not have HCV. Antiviral treatment in CKD patients can be complicated because many of the agents used for anti-HCV therapy can accumulate to toxic levels in the setting of renal impairment. Treatment of HCV compensated cirrhosis with the new DAA therapy Qurevo “ombitasvir/ paritaprevir/ritonavir” with ribavirin in ESRD was approved in many countries. Based on that, the current study was conducted aiming to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Qurevo /Ribavirin regimen in ESRD Egyptian patients on regular hemodialysis who are infected with hepatitis C virus (HCV) . 50 ESRD patients on regular hemodialysis with a mean age of 51.4 years ,range from 23-77 years, 25 (50%) males, 25(50% females) were enrolled in a prospective cohort study. The study took place at the hepatic virology clinic at Ain Shams University hospital over a period of 15 months( from December 2016 to February 2018) . Patients with Child’s C cirrhosis patients, platelet count <50000 /mm3, HCC , extrahepatic malignancy ,pregnancy or inability to use effective contraception, inadequately controlled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c> 9%) were all excluded. All patients were subjected to full history taking( including renal condition and hepatitis C infection) , full clinical examination ,baseline laboratory investigations (CBC, serum creatinine ,HCV Ab, HBsAg, PCR for HCV, liver functions “Total & direct bilirubin/serum albumin/ INR”, liver enzymes “AST/ALT”, alpha feto protein, pelvi-abdominal ultrasound). Treatment with daily fixed-dose combination of 2 tabs Qurevo “ombitasvir (12.5 mg,NS5A inhibitor)/paritaprevir (75 mg, NS3/4A protease inhibitor) /ritonavir (50 mg)” with meal + 200 mg ribavirin daily for 12 weeks was done. The primary endpoint was sustained virologic response 12 weeks after end of therapy (SVR12). Also, tracing the incidence of adverse events according to checklist (by symptoms, signs, investigations) and follow-up CBC, liver enzymes,liver functions at weeks 4, 8 and 12 were done. The results revealed, regarding the efficacy, SVR12 rate was 96% (48/50); 2 patients had virologic failure. This goes in line with the RUBY-I and RUBY-II trials presented at the meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) held in Boston in November 2016, in which SVR12 rate was 96%(46/48) in RUBY-I, 94% (17/18) in RUBY-II. Also, like the study in Japan by Atsukawa in 2017, SVR12 rate was 96.8%(30/31) and like study in Egypt by Hanno year 2018, SVR12 was also 96%(48/50) .It was similar to study in USA by Eric year 2018, SVR12 rate was 95%(63/66) and another study in Japan by Arai year 2018, SVR12 was 98.7% As regards safety and adverse events ,the most frequent was fatigue/asthenia in 44 patients (88%) and worsening anemia (Hb dropped to <10 g/dl) in 42 patients (84%). GIT upset occurred in 10 patients (20%), sleep disorders in 8 patients (16%) ,decreased appetite in 8 patients (16%),respiratory distress in 6 patients (12%) ,headache, dizziness in 6 patients(12%). Muscle spasms in 4 patients (8%). Itching(pruritis) occurred in 3 patients(6%).2 patients (4%) were non-responders to treatment and another 2 (4%) were relapsers.Death was reported in 4 patients (8%), post treatment probably unrelated to treatment, due to myocardial infarction, pulmonary edema, severe hypotension on hemodialysis sessions, shock due to blood loss in retroperitoneal hematoma following peritoneal dialysis.Hepatic decompensation, hypersenisitivity (angioedema), teratogenicity and drug interactions did not occur in any patient (0%).Other events occurred in 11 patients (22%)% during therapy, not yet proved to be related or not to the drug. They were parenchymal liver changes in ultrasound at the end of therapy after being normal before therapy (in 3 patients), thrombocytopenia, increased alkaline phosphatase, hiccough, deterioration of hypertension, urinary tract infection, lower limb cellulitis, vaginal bleeding, chest infection(in 1 patient each). These results go in line with RUBY-I trial and Eric study in USA, 2018 in which anemia was the most common adverse event .But, unlike study of Atsukawa 2017 in Japan, which used RBV free regimen and Hanna 2018 in Egypt, which enrolled different CKD stages (2-5) in which pruritis was the most common adverse event. As regards follow-up CBC, liver enzymes and liver functions week 4,8 and 12, it was found that HGB levels decrease, total and indirect bilirubin increase due to RBV associated hemolysis. AST,ALT and INR levels decrease .This is in agreement with Hanno study in Egypt 2018. As regards anemia being the most common adverse event, several studies including the current study confirm 2 observations .First, anemia during HCV treatment occurs higher with more advanced renal failure(More in CKD 5 dialysis patients than CKD 2-5 than non-CKD). Second, it occurs in majority of the studies with ribavirin including regimens.This was obvious in the current study which included both advanced renal failure, ESRD patients on regular hemodialysis and ribavirin including regimen. To overcome anemia in ESRD patients receiving HCV therapy, ribavirin dose is 200 mg/day (typically starting at 200 mg three times weekly and titrating up to 200 mg/day as tolerated). Ribavirin should be discontinued if the hemoglobin level decreases by more than 2 g/dL despite the use of erythropoietin according to (AASLD) guidelines.SVR12 rate in the current study was achieved in 100% of patients who had to stop or modify ribavirin dose ;this means that RBV absence didn’t affect the SVR12 in these patients. This leads us to think of RBV-free regimens in ESRD patients as a safer option of treatment to avoid severe hemolytic anemia with Ribavirin that occurs with these patients despite various anemia mangements during therapy. Current guidelines recommend two RBV-free regimens for patients with HCV infection and stage 4 or 5 CKD, elbasvir/grazoprevir, which is approved for the treatment of patients with GT1 or 4 infection, and glecaprevir/pibrentasvir, which has pangenotypic activity. Both show high efficacy(SVR12) with no anemia as adverse event in ESRD. For this reason, the regimen used in the current study ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir and ribavirin would be considered to be alternative to the 2 recommended regimens. However, these 2 regimens are not yet available in Egypt. The current study had 2 non-responders and 2 relapsers.The study tried to correlate between them and RBV dose modification and also HCV viral load but there was no statistical significant relation between them. The results confirm the efficacy of Qurevo “ombitasvir/ paritaprevir/ritonavir” with Ribavirin combination therapy in ESRD patients on regular hemodialysis with HCV infection, with anemia as the most frequent adverse event. However, the effect of this regimen in CKD staging, different HCV genotypes and causes of virologic failure/relapse couldn’t be studied. |