Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Comparison between Invasive and non-invasive assessment of blood pressure in hypertensive disorders of pregnancy /
المؤلف
Mohamed, Asmaa Gamal El Din.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / اسماء جمال الدين محمد
مشرف / سلوى رشدى دمترى
مناقش / خالد محمد عبد الغنى
مناقش / حاتم محمد عبد الرحمن
الموضوع
Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.
تاريخ النشر
2020.
عدد الصفحات
63 p. ;
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
أمراض القلب والطب القلب والأوعية الدموية
الناشر
تاريخ الإجازة
25/11/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة أسيوط - كلية الطب - Cardiology
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 83

from 83

Abstract

Hypertensive disorders of pregnancy are important causes of maternal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Hypertension is one of the most commonly reported health conditions among pregnant women and complicates 5–10% of all pregnancies.(Martin et al., 2009) (Wagner et al., 2007) The measurement of central BP in hypertensive patients became more important because of its predictive value for cardiovascular events. Direct intra-arterial readings are considered to be the gold standard method for blood pressure measurement but because arterial cannulation is associated with risks, alternative non-invasive blood pressure measurements may be used. (Araghi et al., 2006) In our study, we aimed to assess the accuracy of non-invasive central blood pressure by oscillometric automated device (Mobil O graph) in comparison to the invasive blood pressure measurement by arterial cannulation in patients with hypertensive disorders in pregnancy. We enrolled 100 pregnant women and 10 healthy non-pregnant women as a control group, central blood pressure was measured invasively by arterial cannula and non-invasively by oscillometric automated device (Mobil O Graph). We have found a high correlation between non-invasive central blood pressure measurements and invasively measured both systolic (r 0.968, p=0.000) and diastolic (r 0.687, p=0.000).