الفهرس 
شكروتقديريوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 240 |  |  |
| | | from | 240 | | |
المستخلص
ملخص الدراسة باللغة الأجنبية
Summary
First: Introduction to the problem of study:
Social protection is not considered a cost, but an investment as most countries, even the poorest, expand to bear the costs of social protection programs; Well-designed and implemented social protection plans not only generate multiple productive and social impacts, but can also boost local economic growth.
Also, social protection represented in Policies of Governmental Support is a crucial component of poverty reduction strategies for Priority care Categories, as government support works to enhance the resilience of the Priority care Categories to face their vulnerability, and government support addresses economic barriers that prevent the transfer of Priority care Categories to more productive and sustainable livelihoods.
Policies of Governmental Support also work to help the Priority care Categories to achieve social security for them, by achieving the fulfillment of their multiple needs, and achieving equal opportunities in their access to services, in addition to working to create flexibility for Priority care Categories in their access to services and goods.
Social planning contributes to directing Policies of Governmental Support for the Priority care Categories by identifying their urgent needs; It also contributes to assessing the needs of the Priority care Categories and determining their priorities, so that governmental support can satisfy them, thus achieving social security for these important groups in society.
Second: The Study Importance:
The importance of the current study is determined as follows:
(1) The need for societies to achieve social security for their members, in all its social, economic and health dimensions, and their awareness of the importance of community stability and its returns on the development and development processes that all societies seek.
(2) The negative effects resulting from the failure to achieve social security in society, such as deviations, crimes and instability that lead to the spread of violence and sabotage.
(3) The increase in poverty rates in Egypt, which reached 32.5% in 2018, compared to 27.8% in 2015, an increase of 4.7 percentage points.
(4) The increase in the number of the Priority care Categories in the governorate of Sohag, represented by Upper Egypt, where it recorded 59.6%, and the poorest villages were concentrated in the Sohag governorate with a number of 236 villages, while the number of the first care groups increased in Beheira governorate represented by Lower Egypt, where it recorded 47.7%, as well. It had the largest number of the poorest villages in Lower Egypt, with 155 villages.
(5) Governmental interest in the Priority care Categories and those most in need, and working to provide protection and care for them, especially after the economic reform measures, in an attempt to mitigate their effects on these Categories, as the Ministry of Finance allocated 200 billion pounds for pensions during the fiscal year 2018/2019, in support For social protection networks for the Priority care Categories.
(6) Increasing interest in Policies of Governmental Support after the recent economic reforms and the subsequent increase in burdens on all individuals, especially low-income groups, as the state’s spending on subsidizing food commodities increased to reach 84 billion pounds in the 2020/2021 budget, of which 42 billion were for bread subsidies.
(7) The government’s desire to reform support policies and make them in one direction, which is monetary support to reach support for those who are not eligible.
Third: The Study Objectives:
(1) Determining the reality of Policies of Governmental Support for the Priority care Categories in the two study communities (Sohag and Beheira governorates).
(2) Determining the reality of social security for the Priority care Categories in the two study communities (Sohag and Beheira governorates).
(3) Determining the differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Buhaira governorates) in achieving Policies of Governmental Support for social security for the the Priority care Categories.
(4) Determining the relationship between demographic variables (age, income, health status, educational status, social status, quality of housing, housing ownership) for beneficiaries of the Priority care Categories and achieving health security for the first-care groups in the two study communities (Sohag and Beheira governorates).
(5) Determining the difficulties facing Policies of Governmental Support in achieving social security for the Priority care Categories in the two study communities (Sohag and Beheira governorates).
(6) Reaching for proposals that assist Policies of Governmental Support in achieving social security for the Priority care Categories.
Fourth: The Study concepts:
1) The concept of The Policies of Governmental Support.
2) The concept of social security.
3) The concept of Priority care Categories.
Fifth: The study hypotheses:
The first hypothesis: ”There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Buhaira governorates) regarding the monetary support policies and the achievement of social security for the Priority care Categories .”
Sub-hypotheses emerge from it:
(1) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) on monetary support policies and the achievement of justice for the Priority care Categories.
(2) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) on monetary support policies and achieving flexibility for the Priority care Categories .
(3) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) on monetary support policies and the achievement of equal opportunities for Priority care Categories .
(4) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) regarding cash support policies and satisfying the needs of the Priority care Categories.
The second hypothesis: ”There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) regarding the Policies of Kind support and the achievement of social security for the Priority care Categories.”
Sub-hypotheses emerge from it:
(1) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) on the Policies of Kind support and the achievement of justice for the Priority care Categories .
(2) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) regarding the Policies of Kind support and the achievement of flexibility for the Priority care Categories .
(3) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) regarding the Policies of Kind support and the achievement of equal opportunities for the Priority care Categories.
(4) There are statistically significant differences between the two study communities (Sohag and Al-Beheira governorates) on the Policies of Kind support and satisfying the needs of the Priority care Categories.
The third hypothesis: ”There is a positive, statistically significant relationship between the demographic variables (age, income, health status, educational status, social status, quality of housing, housing ownership) for the beneficiaries of the policies of governmental support and achieving social security for the Priority care Categories in the two study communities (Sohag governorates, and the lake)
Sixth: The study Methodological Procedures:
The study Type:
This study is considered one of the descriptive and analytical studies, as the descriptive study aims to report specific characteristics or a situation that is dominated by the characteristic of determination. It also depends on gathering facts, analyzing and interpreting them to extract their significance, and through that, it leads to issuing generalizations about the situation or phenomenon that the researcher studies.
Methodology used:
In this study, the researcher used the social survey method.
The study Tools:
The data collection tools for this study are as follows:
1) Investigation for the Priority care Categories in the governorates of Sohag and Beheira.
2) Semi-standardized interview guide for experts and those responsible for governmental support policies.
The study Fields:
- The human domain:
1) Social survey of the sample for the Priority care Categories targeted with cash support through the Takaful and Karama program, and Governmental Support through the food commodity support cards in the poorest villages in the governorates of Sohag and Beheira, where the sample size was (245) individuals.
2) A social sample survey of experts and officials responsible for governmental support policies, where the sample size was (15) individuals.
- Spatial domain:
The study was conducted in the governorates of Sohag and Beheira, for the following reasons:
1) Sohag governorate represents the first governorate in the number of the poorest villages at the level of Upper Egypt governorates.
2) Buhaira governorate represents the first governorate in the number of poorest villages at the level of Lower and Delta governorates.
3) Poverty rates converge in the governorates of Sohag and Beheira, in addition to the convergence of social, cultural and demographic characteristics between them.
- Time domain:
The period of data collection from the field took about 3 months, starting from 9/20/2020 AD to 12/28/2020 AD.
Seventh: The study Results:
The results of the study reached the following:
(1) The results of the study’s hypotheses indicated that there were no statistically significant differences at the significance level (0.01) between the average degrees of Beheira and Sohag in the monetary support policies and the achievement of social security for the Priority care Categories, namely (achieving justice– achieving flexibility– achieving equal opportunities– satisfying needs) .
(2) The results of the study hypotheses indicated that there were no statistically significant differences at the significance level (0.01) between the average degrees of Beheira and Sohag in the Policies of Kind support and the achievement of social security for the Priority care Categories, namely (achieving justice- achieving flexibility- achieving equal opportunities- satisfying needs) .
(3) The results of the study hypotheses verify the validity of the hypothesis that there is a positive relationship with statistical significance between the demographic variables (age, income, health status, educational status, marital status, quality of housing, housing ownership) for the beneficiaries of Policies of Governmental Support and achieving social security for the Priority care Categories in the two communities of the study. (Sohag and Buhaira governorates) partially.