الفهرس 
مقدمة الدراسةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 355 |  |  |
| | | from | 355 | | |
المستخلص
This study seeks to monitor the determinants of the press discourse of both the July 23, 1952 and January 25, 2011 revolutions, as well as aiming to study and analyze their presentation frameworks. This research is a descriptive analytical study, in this context, the researcher applied the theory of Discourse Analysis in addition to the Frame Analysis Theory. The researcher used those methods: the media survey method and the comparison method, and data was collected using three tools: Content Analysis, Discourse Analysis and frame analysis of news. By using the comprehensive survey method, The sample of the study includes all relevant puplished material on Egyptian print newspapers post the two revolutions. So the research based on ””Al-Ahram-Al-Akhbar-Al-Balagh”” newspapers for July 23, 1952 revolution, and ””Al-Ahram - Al-Masry Al-Youm - Al-Wafd”” newspapers for January 25, 2011 revolution, within a three months period post the outbreak of the two revolutions. As follows: for the July Revolution, between July 23, 1952 till October 23, 1952 and for January Revolution from January 25, 2011 to April 25, 2011. The study led to a series of results, the most important findings are: - topics such as ””corruption during the reign of the king”” were the most dominant content which was addressed through the press discourse of (Al-Ahram - Al-Akhbar-Al-Balagh) papers post July 23, 1952 revolution. Meanwhile, ””principles of the revolution”” came as the second predominant topic.- On the other hand, topics such as ””the revolution’s demands”” dominated the press speech after January 25 revolution. Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper came first in tackling the story, followed by Al-Wafd, and finally came Al-Ahram. The same pattern was repeated when the three papers tackled stories about ””corruption during Mubarak’s era. - Al-Ahram newspaper`s orientation after the two revolutions was the same, by relying on the “army” or “military council” as active forces despite its different ownership type. while Al-Balagh and Al-Wafd papers differed in sitting their communication agenda, As Al-Balagh relied on the ””people”” as the first active force, while Al-Wafd used the ””youth”” as a third actor. - The three newspapers of the 23 July Revolution concerned with the thesis “Corruption in the King’s Era”, “Principles of the Revolution” and “Direct Results of the Revolution”, while the newspapers of the 25 January Revolution concerned with the theses of the “Military Council”, “Corruption” and “Reorganization of State Institutions”, and the thesis of ””insecurity”” overshadowed the press speech of Al-Ahram newspaper, while the thesis of ””constitutional amendments”” and ””martyrs of the revolution and compensation”” overshadowed the press speech of Al-Masry Al-Youm newspaper. - The ””news stamp””, in the press treatment related to the 23 July Revolution, dominated the press speech of the study newspapers. The “news stamp” also dominated the newspapers of the 25 January revolution, so that the news came in the first position , then the ””press column”” in the second position, and then ””the analytical article””, which clarified the agreement between the newspapers of the two revolutions in using the news story as the first art of the press forms used. - The newspapers of the two revolutions differed in the sources of the press material and the sources of information, due to the difference in the two study periods. - The study newspapers of the January 25, 2011 revolution agreed with the newspapers of the July 23 revolution to rely on the internal pages to publish the press speech related to the two revolutions. - As it became clear that the newspapers of the January 25, 2011 revolution were superior to the newspapers of the July 23, 1952 revolution in using greater visibility. - from the results of the study, the researcher noted that the study newspapers in the two revolutions differed in the employment of the various media frameworks to serve the press speech related to the two revolutions. - The researcher noted through the results of the study that the different timing of the two revolutions influenced the quality of the reference frameworks used by the study papers in the two revolutions. It was also clear from the results of the study that there is a clear difference between the two revolutions in the attitudes of the newspapers under study towards them, despite the predominance of the trend in favor of them, due to the difference in the periods of the two revolutions. - It is noticed through the analytical results that the logical paths of proof of convergence in the press speech related to the two revolutions approve, despite the varying arrangement, while the logical paths of proof of the two revolutions coincided greatly. -Through the analytical results, the researcher notes that there are differences between the objectives of the press treatment of the July 23, 1952 and January 25, 2011 revolutions, in their dependence on other goals of press treatment.