الفهرس 
IntroductionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 103 |  |  |
| | | from | 103 | | |
Abstract
Reproduction of papillary downturn particularly at the stylish zone is quite possibly the most difficult periodontal treatment. there is a requirement for an insignificantly intrusive treatment methodology for the remaking of inadequate interdental papillae.
Hence, the current Comparative review clinical preliminary intended to evaluate the patient’s fulfillment after the infusion of hyaluronic corrosive for the reproduction of lacking interdental papilla contrasted with a blend of hyaluronic and chitosan gel. the optional results incorporated the stature of the dark triangle and the adjustment of surface region, clinical periodontal boundaries as testing profundity, plaque list and gingival file at the inadequate papilla site, and torment level 4 hours after infusions.
14 patients with 42 inadequate interdental papillae in the between bicuspid district were haphazardly apportioned to get whether hyaluronic corrosive gel ( bunch A) or hyaluronic and chitosan gel ( bunch B). All members remembered for the review had no less than one insufficient papilla showing class I or class II interdental papillary misfortune.
The hyaluronic or hyaluronic and chitosan gel were infused twice at 3 weeks spans and the patients followed up for a very long time. the clinical periodontal boundary, surface region, and the stature of the dark triangle were estimated before first infusion, 3 and a half year after the fact. The aggravation level after infusion and the patient’s fulfillment following a half year were estimated utilizing a visual simple scale.
The current review result, in regards to the Height of the dark triangle (mm), showed Hyaluronic corrosive had a higher mean worth at this point the contrast between the two gatherings was not measurably critical
In addition, the Hyaluronic corrosive and Chitosan bunch had a higher mean patient fulfillment than the hyaluronic bunch.