Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Ultrasound assessment of cervical spinal canal diameter for efficacy of discectomy /
الناشر
Mahmoud Elsayed Massoud ,
المؤلف
Mahmoud Elsayed Massoud
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Mahmoud Elsayed Massoud
مشرف / Yasser Hassan Elmiligui
مشرف / Wael Mohamed Tawfik Koptan
مشرف / Waseem Mohamed Elgendy
تاريخ النشر
2020
عدد الصفحات
165 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
جراحة العظام والطب الرياضي
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2020
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - كلية الطب - Department of Orthopaedic Surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 209

from 209

Abstract

Background:Degenerative cervical disc disease is a common condition that pepole develop symptoms gradually, they can be easily grouped into axial neck pain, radiculopathy, and myelopathy Surgery is performed to decompress the spinal cord. While imaging are used in the perioperative spinal cord decompression including computed tomography (CT) scan, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and ultrasound (US) usage is relatively new. US is a simple, safe, rapid, non-invasive, and inexpensive modality that constitutes a potential alternative when other modalities are not suitable or unavailable.Purpose: The purpose of this study was to report the ability of ultrasound to assess the cervical spinal canal diameter for efficacy of discectomy. Patient Sample: 30 patients will be enrolled in this study. All patients complained of cervical spinal canal stenosis symptoms. Outcome Measures: Patients were assessed pre-operative & post-operative clinically & by US.Methods: It consists of a prospectively collected consecutive series of 30 patients with cervical disc disease who met inclusion criteria between July 2018 and April 2019 with last follow up May 2020. They were selected for anterior cervical decompression discectomy then measuring the canal diameter by US done in Helmya Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. The study include 15 males and 15 females with mean age 38 years.Results: There was statistically significant relation between preoperative US & MRI (P<0.01), There was statistically significant variation between pre-operative & post-operative US (P<0.05), VAS significantly improved postoperatively (P<0