الفهرس 
OtosclerosisOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 100 |  |  |
| | | from | 100 | | |
Abstract
Background: The microscope is the conventional method used by ear surgeons to view the middle ear structures, allowing for binocular vision and the freedom of both hands. Its main disadvantage is the need for an unobstructed, direct view of the operating area. The end-aural incision, drilling of the bony auditory canal, and regular repositioning of the patient and the surgeon are a few examples of how the operation has to adapt to the microscope. Nevertheless, the microscope has proven itself as the tool of choice in stapes surgery with reliable outcomes.
Objective: to compare endoscopic and microscopic interventions in stapes surgery regarding intraoperative and post-operative outcomes.
Patients and Methods: The review was a meta analytic & systematic review that included randomized controlled trials (RCT), case series and retrospective studies which studied the comparison of microscopic and endoscopic stapes surgery, 15 articles published between 2014 and 2020 were included in our study.
Data Sources: Medline databases (PubMed, Medscape, ScienceDirect. EMF-Portal) and all materials available in the Internet till 2020.
Results: Our results showed that the injury to the chorda tympani nerve was significantly higher in microscopic vs endoscopic groups. And also as regard the operative times, it was significant longer in microscopic vs. endoscopic groups. But there is no significant difference as regarde pain, dizziness, perforation of tympanic membrane, delayed conductive hearing & post-operative Air-bone gap improvement and taste disturbance between both groups.
Conclusion: Endoscopic stapes surgeries are technically feasible, safe and promising. Overall, our study indicates endoscopic and microscopic stapes surgery has similar audiological success, with some data suggesting a lower risk of chorda tympani injury and postoperative taste disturbance with the endoscope. Endoscopic stapes surgery appears to be a reasonable alternative to microscopic stapes surgery, with similar complications (chorda tympani nerve injury, pain, Perforation of tympanic membrane, taste disturbance, Dizziness, and delayed conductive hearing). Shorter operative times shorter and lower postoperative air-bone gap were found in endoscopic stapes surgery. Superior visibility with the endoscope was consistently reported in all the studies. This meta-analysis of the current evidence supports the use of endoscopic techniques for stapes surgery.