Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Effect of manual versus mechanical lymphatic drainage on total lymphocytic count in healthy subjects /
الناشر
Michel Fathy Fayek ,
المؤلف
Michel Fathy Fayek
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Michel Fathy Fayek
مشرف / Maher Ahmed Elkeblawy,
مشرف / Abeer Mahmoud Yousef
مناقش / Maher Ahmed Elkeblawy,
تاريخ النشر
2019
عدد الصفحات
82 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
العلاج الطبيعي والرياضة والعلاج وإعادة التأهيل
تاريخ الإجازة
11/11/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - علاج طبيعي - Basic Science
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 108

from 108

Abstract

Background: lymphocytes are one of the main components of the immune system, reaching an optimum level of lymphocytic count may improve immunity in healthy subjects or fasten recovery from diseases; therefore manual lymphatic draining effects were compared to mechanical lymphatic draining. Purpose: This study was conducted to investigate manual lymphatic drainage versus mechanical lymphatic drainage effects on total lymphocytic count in healthy subjects. Subjects: forty five healthy individuals of both genders were conducted to this study, their ages ranged from 20 to 40 years old Participants were randomly alphabetically chosen and divided into three equal groups each group included 15 subjects. Methods: this study was conducted in Nasser institute hospital outpatient physical therapy department Cairo Egypt; group A (Experimental group A): Fifteen participants received mechanical lymphatic drainage Course segmentally. group B (experimental group B): Fifteen participants received segmental manual lymphatic drainage course. group c (control group c): Fifteen participants did not receive any treatment approach. lymphocytic count were measured before and after every week through 5 consecutive weeks by medonic cell counter in lab. Results: lymphocytic counts increased gradually from the 0-Day to 1st week through the 2nd, 3rd, 4th and 5th week respectively in manual massage than mechanical massage and both than the control group