Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Comparing shock wave, magnetic field and low level laser therapy for carpal tunnel syndrome patients /
الناشر
Mostafa Shawky Mohammed Khaled ,
المؤلف
Mostafa Shawky Mohammed Khaled
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Mostafa Shawky Mohammed Khaled
مشرف / Nawal Abd El-Raouf Abou Shady
مشرف / Samah Yousef
مناقش / Nawal Abd El-Raouf Abou Shady
تاريخ النشر
2019
عدد الصفحات
127 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
العلاج الطبيعي والرياضة والعلاج وإعادة التأهيل
تاريخ الإجازة
16/11/2019
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - علاج طبيعي - Neuromuscular Disorders and it’s Surgery
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 176

from 176

Abstract

Background: Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most commonly reported nerve entrapment syndrome , 8% of population workers reported having CTS in 2010.Purpose: To compare between influence of shock wave therapy, pulsed electromagnetic field and low level laser on CTS patients. Methodology: Forty five patients from both genders (10men &35 women) aged between 20-45 years were assigned into three equal groups. group (A): received a program of low level laser with a beam diameter of 0.5 cm, a wavelength of 904 nm. The irradiance used was 6.0 J per treatment site, which was delivered by applying 10mW in continuous wave mode for approximately 90 Sec for each point above wrist(whole session 6 minutes) Group(B): received a program of pulsed electromagnetic field around wrist, for 20 minute every session and group (C): received a program of shock wave therapy for 2000 pulse per session at energy flux density (EFD) of 0.03mJ/mm2 1.6 bar per session. one time \week for 6 weeks ,the program for group (A) and(B) 3 times\week for 6weeks day other day. The evaluation procedures had been done for all patients before and after 6 weeks of treatment program including median nerve motor and sensory conduction velocity study, Pinch dynamometer to assess muscle power of thumb and index finger, and Sensory assessment using visual analogue scale to detect pain intensity for all patients. Results :The highest improvement in the values of median sensory and motor nerve conduction velocity was clear in group (A)than group(B)&(C) (P value<0.001)