Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Comparison of accuracy between two methods of digital three dimensional indirect orthodontic brackets bonding techniques :
المؤلف
Mahran, Ahmed Abdelhalim.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / أحمد عبدالحليم مهران
مشرف / وائل محمد مبارك رفاعي
مشرف / أحمد شوقي هاشم
مناقش / وليد حسن الكنان
مناقش / كريم ماهر جابر
الموضوع
Orthodontics.
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
97 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
Orthodontics
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنيا - كلية طب الأسنان - تقويم الأسنان
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 97

from 97

Abstract

With oblique bonding, orthodontic attachments are bonded to tooth after being transferred from dental casts (running fashions). Many orthodontists select indirect bonding over direct bonding because of the time savings it provides. With the advent of CAD/CAM software program, switch trays may be digitally shaped. By means of evaluating the digital bracket locations with the real bracket positions after oblique bonding, this research assessed and as compared the accuracy of setting orthodontic brackets using a 3D published transfer tray and a transfer tray created over 3-D revealed models with resin brackets.
For the cause of indirect bonding, 280 teeth have been decided on from 14 patients and cut up into two organizations:
For organization A, a 3-d revealed oblique bonding transfer tray become used to efficiently bond 140 brackets on 7 sufferers.
In group B, we used a vacuum-formed transfer tray to bind a hundred and forty resin brackets onto three-D published fashions for seven sufferers.
The affected person’s mouth turned into scanned two times, once earlier than and as soon as after the braces had been bonded, to create a stereolithographic record used to vicinity the braces really. Geomagic manipulate X 20 software program was used to superimpose digital STL files on top of publish-bonding STL documents which will calculate linear and angular deviation of bracket placements.
There has been no statistically substantial distinction among the 2 organizations in terms of the confrontation between the bracket locations for the top arches, even though the group (A) did have larger suggest values for the occluso-gingival linear dimensions. Organization (A) had better mean values for occluso-gingival linear and bucco-lingual linear while evaluating the two groups’ bracket placements at the lower arches, but in any other case there was no statistically great difference among the two arches. Torque readings were in addition reliable throughout each samples. Transferred brackets tended to transport mesially, gingivally, and buccally in each corporations. The charge of bracket debonding did not range appreciably between the 2 groups.
The subsequent findings are self-obvious given the parameters of this research:
Indirect bonding methods in CAD/CAM, such as the ones using a 3-d published switch tray or a vacuum formed transfer tray on three-D published models, are appeared an accurate way for shifting brackets.
The switch accuracy of the vacuum-shaped tray was advanced in all linear and angular assessments besides for torque.
Each organization had an similarly a hit rate of transferring higher and lower arch brackets.
A directional bias was seen within the mesial, gingival, and buccal instructions for each the linear and angular trays.
Bracket bonding failure prices and affected person delight rankings have been similar for each strategies 5.