الفهرس 
الفصل الأوليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 158 |  |  |
| | | from | 158 | | |
المستخلص
The current study deals with the subject of (Lebanese-Jordanian political relations 1939-1967 AD), and the researcher chose 1939 AD because it was the year that witnessed the outbreak of World War II, and the study ended in 1967 AD, which was the year that witnessed the setback of June 1967 AD, the loss of the West Bank, and the influx of immigrants into Lebanon. The researcher pushed to choose the study: The researcher’s convictions of the importance of studying Arab relations. - The controversy surrounding Jordan’s role in Arab politics, which made some liken it to the West’s Trojan horse in the Arab world. - The vitality of the Lebanese people and their distinctive ability to overcome the crises they are going through, which made them a distinguished element in the Arab world. - The great similarity between the two countries in terms of the conditions of their establishment and the means for both of them to gain independence. - The pivotal role played by Jordan and Lebanon in Arab politics. - A study of two states of the ring surrounding the Hebrew state and the controversy surrounding the reality of their roles. The study relied on the historical research methodology with its description, analysis and comparison mechanisms. Study questions: The study attempts to answer the following questions: • What are the features of the development of diplomatic relations between Jordan and Lebanon, and to what extent did the economic and intellectual relations between the two parties affect the development of bilateral relations? • To what extent is it possible to compare the reactions of the two countries to some Arab issues? • Why were Lebanon and Jordan the weakest link in the face of defense projects and Western alliances? • To what extent can the Lebanese-Jordanian positions be analyzed regarding the development of the Palestinian cause? • What are the similarities and differences between the position of Lebanon and Jordan regarding the projects of Arab unity, starting from the Arab League, passing through the projects of Greater Syria, the Fertile Crescent, the unity of Syria and Iraq, and the establishment of the United Arab Republic in 1958 AD. • What was the impact of the difficult conditions that Jordan and Lebanon were going through, and their relationship with the West, on the development of bilateral relations between them? The study came in an introduction, four chapters, and a conclusion that includes the most important results and a list of the various references of the study. The first chapter was entitled (The development of bilateral relations between Lebanon and Jordan), and it included the establishment of the two states, the Emirate of Transjordan and the Republic of Lebanon, and the Jordanian-Lebanese relations before 1939). The second chapter was titled (Jordanian-Lebanese Relations in Light of Defense Projects and Western Alliances), beginning with the declaration of the Middle East defense project, passing through the Baghdad Pact and the Eisenhower project to fill the vacuum in the Middle East. The third chapter is titled The Palestinian Issue in the Jordanian-Lebanese Relations The fourth chapter was entitled (The Impact of Arab Unity Projects on Lebanese-Jordanian Relations). The study came out with many results, the most important of which are: • The circumstances of the establishment of the Emirate of Transjordan and the State of Lebanon were similar in the aftermath of the repercussions of the First World War, and the English and French promises to grant independence to the countries that were still subject to the defeated Ottoman state evaporated, so the situation ended with Lebanon submitting to the French mandate and Jordan to the British mandate. • The relations between Jordan and Lebanon went through several stages starting from the common positions that are similar at one time and different at another from the great Syrian revolution, the controversy surrounding the nature of unity or independence. • Lebanon was dominated by a clear, independent trend due to the nature of its demographic and sectarian composition, at a time when Jordan was subject to unitary ambitions that possessed Prince Abdullah bin Al-Hussein, who adopted a different unitary approach that calls for the unity of Syria in nature, including Lebanon, under Jordanian rule, while the Lebanese mood and mentality were at the popular and official levels It is witnessing a growing sense of the independence of the Lebanese entity, and the unwillingness to dissolve into any unified Arab political entity. • Lebanon was one of the chess pieces that Abdullah bin Al-Hussein used to covet to use in establishing this Hashemite entity. The contradiction and convergence of positions between the two countries on common issues. • Oman remained preoccupied with the Lebanese concern, and as Oman had welcomed the declaration of Lebanon’s independence in 1941 AD and the evacuation of the French forces in 1946 AD, it was planning to ensure Lebanon’s annexation of the Greater Syria project. • At a time when the Jordanian official circles had reservations about the defense project in the Middle East and adhered to the need for a unified Arab decision, the Lebanese government welcomed it based on the myth of the policy of neutrality, even if it adhered to the necessity of respecting the Lebanese sovereignty. • Jordan did not officially join the Baghdad Pact, although King Hussein and some Jordanian politicians showed inclinations towards joining it, and the Lebanese government could not hide its inclination towards the Baghdad Pact. • The Jordanian-Lebanese positions were very similar to the Baghdad Pact, and the delegations of the two governments refused to exclude Iraq from the Arab ranks, and the Jordanian delegation distributed the contradictory roles between the prime minister and his foreign minister. • At a time when the Jordanian Parliament explicitly rejected the Baghdad Pact, the Lebanese Parliament was divided between supporters of the project and those opposed to it, and the political parties in the two countries agreed to confront the alliance project. • Jordan’s position was inclined to adopt the principle of Eisenhower, as it was the first Arab country to implement this project. • King Hussein welcomed the Eisenhower principle, while the Jordanian government rejected it, which turned to Moscow, which led to its dismissal. • The Jordanian-Lebanese relations went through important and pivotal turns with regard to the Palestinian cause, which is the central issue of the two countries. King Abdullah welcomed the decision to divide Palestine at the beginning, while the streets in Jordan and Lebanon witnessed widespread popular opposition and a demand for volunteering and donating to protect the Palestinian right. • Jordan and Lebanon took the initiative to participate in the Arab forces to defend Palestine as the first line of defense for the two countries. • The Lebanese government supported the decision to nationalize the clan.