الفهرس Only 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 137 |  |  |
| | | from | 137 | | |
Abstract
Early outcome of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through mini sternotomy and mini thoracotomy versus conventional approach Aim of work Aim of this study is to compare early morbidity and mortality during the in-hospital stay after aortic valve surgeries using minimally invasive approaches through mini sternotomy and right anterior thoracotomy, and conventional full median sternotomy approach patients and methods A prospective study conducted between August 2014 and August 2016 including 60 patients who were candidate for isolated aortic valve replacement through 3 surgical approaches, the conventional full median sternotomy versus 2 minimally invasive approaches, mini sternotomy and right anterior mini thoracotomy, 20 patients for each approach, organized in 3 gr. Patients with rheumatic or degenerative chronic isolated aortic valve disease. Age:20-70yearsold. Operation type: isolated aortic valve replacement. Operation classification: elective. LVfunction:morethan40%. Preoperative general condition: good with no major comorbidities. Bodymassindex:lessthan 30