Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Buccal mucosal graft versus penile pedicled flap for reconstruction of anterior urethral strictures :
الناشر
Ahmed Tawakol Aldosoky Alneshawy ,
المؤلف
Ahmed Tawakol Aldosoky Alneshawy
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Ahmed Tawakol Aldosoky Alneshawy
مشرف / Ismail Shoukry
مشرف / Amr Fayad
مشرف / Mohamed El Ghoneimy
تاريخ النشر
2017
عدد الصفحات
86 P. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
الطب التناسلي
تاريخ الإجازة
22/10/2017
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - كلية الطب - Urology
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 95

from 95

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: Anterior urethral stricture is a challenging disease. Multiplicity of surgical techniques denotes that none is ideal. Very few prospective randomized studies are available to compare different techniques. Our aim is to compare the use of buccal mucosal graft (BMG) versus local penile skin flaps (LPF) in patients with complex anterior urethral strictures. Methods: A total of 34 adult patients with complex anterior urethral stricture were included. A complex anterior urethral stricture was defined as a stricture length of >2 cm and/or previous failed procedures, including urethral dilatation, direct visual internal urethrotomy (DVIU) and urethroplasty. We randomised patients to undergo either buccal mucosa dorsal onlay graft or ventral onlay local penile skin flap urethroplasty. Successful treatment outcome was defined as no further treatment of the urethral stricture required after urethroplasty and peak flow rate >15 ml/s. We compared operative time, estimated blood loss, complications, and recurrence rates in both groups. Results: Mean follow up was 22.3 months in BMG group vs 18.9 months in LPF group. Median stricture length (40 mm in BMG group Vs. 50 mm in LPF group) was not statistically different between the two groups. Mean operative time was 185.9 min and 190.6 min in BMG group and LPF group respectively. Estimated blood loss was significantly higher in LPF group, (median 400 ml and 300 ml in LPF and BMG group respectively, p=0.003). Regarding complications, two patients (11.8%) in each group developed wound infection, one patient (5.9%) in LPF group had urinary fistula, and one patient (5.9%) presented by ventral chordee post operatively. In BMG group, only one patient (5.9%) developed mild limitation of mouth opening. The success rates in the buccal mucosal (88.2%) and penile flap (88.2%) groups were similar