Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
Effect of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of 2 intraoral
canners (in-vitro study)
/
المؤلف
Eslam Mostafa Ismail,
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / Eslam Mostafa Ismail,
مشرف / Iman Salah Eldin Hamdy
مشرف / Noha Adel Elkhodary
مناقش / Badawy Aboelmahasen Badawy
مناقش / Mazen Ahmed Mahmoud Attia
الموضوع
Trios 3 scanner
تاريخ النشر
2021.
عدد الصفحات
96 p. :
اللغة
الإنجليزية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
Dentistry (miscellaneous)
تاريخ الإجازة
11/4/2021
مكان الإجازة
جامعة القاهرة - الفم والأسنان - Fixed Prosthodontics
الفهرس
Only 14 pages are availabe for public view

from 112

from 112

Abstract

Aim: The aim of this in-vitro study was to evaluate the effect of abutment tooth geometry on the accuracy of two intraoral scanners.
Methodology: The present study was conducted using maxillary typodont. Six full coverage crown preparations were performed on central incisors, 1st premolars and 1st molars with known axial wall taper (6o and 12o) using dental parallelometer. Highly accurate table-top scanner (Identica T500) was used to obtain reference scan to the typodont. Two intraoral scanners (3shape Trios and Medit i500) scanned the typodont 13 times to obtain total samples of prepared teeth (n=39) for each group. All scans were exported in standard tessellation language (STL) format. Measurements of trueness and precision for respective tooth preparation were evaluated using reverse engineering software for superimposition and deviation analysis. Comparison between groups was performed by using One-Way ANOVA test followed by Tukey`s Post Hoc test and Independent t- test.
Results: Statistical analysis showed no significant difference in trueness between the two intraoral scanners. Trueness values were 39.9 µm and 41 µm for 3shape Trios 3 and Medit i500. 3shape Trios 3 was significantly more precise (23.6 µm) compared to Medit i500 (34.7 µm). Difference in axial wall taper showed no significant difference in accuracy of both intraoral scanners.
Conclusions: Trios 3 scanner have better precision than Medit i500. Increasing axial wall taper had slight effect on the accuracy of scans obtained by two intraoral scanners.