الفهرس Only 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 173 |  |  |
| | | from | 173 | | |
Abstract
The aim of this study was to compare the clinical and radiological outcomes of mandibular angle fractures (MAFs) managed with three-dimensional (3D) miniplates and standard miniplates (according to champy{u2019}s principles). A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical study was carried out on twelve patients with MAFs, divided into two groups. group A patients were treated with a single 1 - mm 3D titanium miniplate; group B patients were treated with a single 2.0-mm standard titanium miniplate. Patients were followed for 6 months for infection, wound dehiscence, segmental mobility, malocclusion, mouth opening, hardware failure, hardware palpability, paraesthesia, and malunion/non - union. A densitometry analysis was performed using DIGORA software on digital panoramic radiographs to evaluate bone healing. Six complications occurred, representing a total rate of 50%. Three complications occurred in group A and three in group B, with identical complication rates of 50%. No major difference in terms of the radiographic assessment was observed between the two systems