الفهرس | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Background: Far lateral disc herniation is also known as foraminal, intraforaminal, far lateral or extreme lateral disc herniation, which by definition refers to a disc herniation or fragment that resides beneath and lateral to the vertebral facet. Patients with far lateral disc herniations usually present by lower limb radicular pain rather than back pain or both.There has been discussion as to the most suitable surgical approach to a far lateral disc herniation. Some surgeons use an interlaminar approach, but full exposure of the nerve root requires total resection of the facet joint which may lead to subsequent instability of the spine. This has led to the development of approaches to expose the nerve root within the intertransverse space by a paramuscular route with retraction of the erector spinae from the midline, or by muscle splitting, usually with a paramedian incision. These require minimal resection of bone. The paramuscular route is preferred by many, despite its disadvantages, because surgeons are not familiar with the anatomy of the muscle-splitting approach. What we are concerned with here is to compare which surgical aprroache is attain a better and more durable outcome Objective: The aim of this study is to compare between the differnent surgical approaches(medial facetectomy , full facetectomy and fusion,intertransverse ) in the management of single level far lateral lumbar disc herniation. Methods: This is a prospective study done on 33 patients of far lateral disc herniations divided into three groups (11 in each group) group (A) medial facetectomy group ,group (B) full acetectomy and fusion group C paramedian intertransverse in the period between October 2020 and August 2021 in neurosurgery department at Cairo University Hospitals and fulfilling the inclusion criteria. Diagnosis will be made clinically with history (low back pain, sciatica, …). Examination (motor power, straight leg raising test,…) and radiological findings in MRI, CT and X-ray of lumbo-sacral spine. The pain status (VAS) will be pre- and postoperatively evaluated and followed up every three months for one year |