الفهرس 
الفصل الأوليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 198 |  |  |
| | | from | 198 | | |
المستخلص
Introduction: Adolescence and other developmental stages are characterized by a lot of stress and emotional tension, as evidenced by feelings of irrelevance, self-demeaning and anxiety, especially of the future. While quality of life is the foundation that helps people survive even in the worst circumstances, it helps them to move beyond themselves and positively towards life and the future with optimism by discovering the positive aspects, abilities and possibilities within them rather than focusing on the negative aspects of their personality. Overcoming the blind’s obstacles is difficult without providing positive support and support. Because of the importance of the psychological immune variable as a preventive variable of positive psychology, and to the impact of future anxiety and quality of life on the mental health of adolescents in general, and of blind adolescents in particular, this study was conducted to reveal the role of psychological immunity as an adjusted variable of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety in a sample of blind adolescents. Study Problem: The study problem is can be specified in the following questions: 1-Does psychological immunity moderate the strength of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety in the study sample of blind adolescents? 2- Are there differences between male and female blind adolescents in their scores on the psychological immunity scale? 3- Are male and female adolescents blind varying in their scores on the quality of life scale? 4- Are there differences between male and female blind adolescents in their grades on the scale of future anxiety? Study Objectives: The study objectives are defined in the following: 1- Examining the role of psychological immunity as a moderator variable of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety in a sample of blind adolescents. 2- Detection of differences between male and female blind adolescents in psychological immunity. 3- Comparison between male and female blind adolescents in quality of life. 4- Indicate the differences between male and female blind adolescents in the future anxiety. Study Importance: The Theoretical Importance: The study addressed one of the important research topics in the field of positive psychology: the role of psychological immunity as a socio-cognitive and behavioral variable in modifying the strength of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety in a sample of blind adolescents. The Applied Importance: The results of the study may serve to draw the attention of mental health professionals and curriculum makers to the importance of containing the curriculum in order to support psychological immunity and quality of life, reduce future anxiety, and do not neglect those with needs, especially the category of blind persons. Study Terminology: - Psychological Immunity. - Quality of Life. - Future Anxiety. - Blind of Adolescents. Study Determinants: 1) Methodological Determinants: Method: This study is a descriptive study based on the comparative correlative descriptive approach, the correlative descriptive curriculum where the role of psychological immunity is identified as a modified variable of the strength of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety. comparative descriptive approach; where comparison between the sample of blind and ordinary in psychiatric immunity, quality of life and anxiety of the future. Study Scales: 1- Scale of The Psychological Immunity for Blind of Adolescents (by researcher). 2- Scale of Quality of Life for Blind of Adolescents (by researcher). 3- Scale of Future Anxiety for Blind of Adolescents (by researcher). 4- Scale of Farouk Moussa for Blind Intelligence (2015). 5- Scale of the Socio-Economic Cultural Level (by Mohamed Saffan & Doaa Khattab, 2016). 2) The Human Determinants: The study sample is consistent of (100) male/females blind of adolescents, divided into (50 males & 50 females), selected purposely, aged (13–15-year-olds) with average age (13.90) and standard deviation (0.717). 3) The Spatial Determinants: The study sample is selected from Al-Nour & Al-Amal School for the Blind, following Al-Nouzha & Al-Zaiton directorate, Cairo governorate. 4) The Time Determinants: The study is applied in the first half of the academic year (2023/2024), starting in Feb 2023 to Mar 2023. Review of Literature: Firstly: Studies have tackled with the Psychological Immunity in blind of adolescents. Secondly: Studies have tackled with Quality of Life in blind of adolescents. Third: Studies have tackled with Future Anxiety in blind of adolescents. Fourthly: Studies tackle with the relationship between the Quality of Life and Psychological Immunity in adolescents. Fifth: Studies tackle with the relationship between the Future Anxiety and Psychological Immunity in adolescents. Sixthly: Studies tackle with the relationship between the Future Anxiety and Quality of Life in adolescents. Study Hypotheses: In light of the theoretical framework and results of previous studies, the study hypotheses are defined in the following: 1- Psychological immunity scores modify the strength of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety in the study sample of blind adolescents. 2- There are statistically significant differences between male and female grade averages of blind adolescents on the blind’s psychological immunity scale. 3- There are statistically significant differences between male and female grade averages of blind adolescents on the scale of quality of life for the blind. 4- There are statistically significant differences between male and female grade averages of blind adolescents on the scale of future anxiety for the blind. Statistical Approaches: 1- Alpha Coefficient, for counting reliability of the scales. 2- Pearson Coefficient Correlation, for counting the Split- Half Reliability of scales. 3- Spearman-Brown Split Half Reliability (Spearman’s Rank Correlation Coefficient), for correcting the scale length. 4- Non-Parameter T. Test, for differences among independent groups. 5- Partial Correlation coefficient to verify the veracity of the first hypothesis. 6- Multiple correlation to verify of the first hypothesis. Study Results: The Firstly hypothesis: states that “Study sample scores from blind adolescents are adjusted on the psychological immunity scale of blind adolescents from the strength of the relationship between their score on the quality-of-life measurements of blind adolescents and the future anxiety of blind adolescents”. The imposition is based on the model that examines the role of the third factor; as a factor modified from the relationship to increase or weaken its strength after its isolation or statistical control; Simple, partial and multiple correlation coefficients were used to verify the veracity of this imposition, since after calculating the partial correlation coefficient between the study’s sample scores on the quality-of-life measurements and future anxiety and statistically controlling the impact of the sample members of blind adolescents on the psychological immunity scale, the value of the correlation coefficient between quality of life and future anxiety decreased. (-0.733) to (-0.331) i.e. it has become less than about half the value of the binding coefficient; This indicates the role of psychological immunity as an adjusted variable of the strength of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety, to ascertain more the impact of psychological immunity on the strength of the relationship between quality of life and future anxiety, and to ensure that multiple correlation is the other side of the association; The multiple correlation coefficient between the study sample grades on the psychological immunity scale and their scores on the quality-of-life and future anxiety measurements; Its value (0.840), which is higher than that of the simple correlation coefficient between psychological immunity scores and both quality of life and future anxiety, affects their degree and relationship.. The Secondly hypothesis: it states that “There are statistically significant differences between the average study sample scores of male and female blind adolescents on the psychological immunity scale of blind adolescents in the male direction”. To ascertain the veracity of this assignment, the researcher calculated the parametric test to indicate the differences between the independent groups. The results show the veracity of the second assumption that there are statistically significant differences between the average scores of male and female blind adolescents on the psychological immunity of blind adolescents (emotional balance, psychological flexibility, optimism, and overall degree) in the direction of male blind adolescents. Comparing this result with the results of previous studies that are easily accessible, we note that they have agreed with the results of the study (Mankyux and Zdanwich, 2016), the study (Masih and Verbekah, 2018) and the study (Nasma Shaaban, 2020) which established the existence of statistical function differences between males and females in psychological immunity in the direction of males. The third hypothesis: it states that “There are statistically significant differences between the average study sample scores of male and female blind adolescents on the quality-of-life scale of blind adolescents in the male direction”. To ascertain the veracity of this assignment, the researcher calculated the parametric test to indicate the differences between independent groups. The results indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the study sample score averages of male and female blind adolescents on the quality of life scale of blind adolescents (satisfaction with life, quality of time management, quality of family life, quality of life of consciousness, and overall grade) in the direction of blind adolescents. Comparing this result with the results of previous easily accessible studies, we note that they agreed with the results of the study (Torres et al., 2013), the study (Kurdistan, Danishvar and Rostay, 2014) and the study (Fadia Rizk, 2015), which established statistical differences between males and females in quality of life in the direction of males. The Fourthly hypothesis: it states that “There are statistically significant differences between the average study sample scores of male and female blind adolescents on the scale of future anxiety of blind adolescents in the direction of females”. To ascertain the veracity of this assignment, the researcher calculated the parametric test to indicate the differences between independent groups. The results indicated that there were statistically significant differences between the study sample score averages of male and female blind adolescents on the scale of future anxiety for blind adolescents (negative outlook of life, school anxiety, economic anxiety, social anxiety, and overall degree) in the direction of female blind adolescents. Comparing this finding with the findings of previous easily accessible studies, we note that they have agreed with the findings of the study (Bolat et al., 2011), the study (Zainab Syed, 2014) and the study (Bhyovanswari et al., 2016) which demonstrated the existence of statistical differences between males and females in future anxiety towards females.