الفهرس 
مصطلحات الدراسةيوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 158 |  |  |
| | | from | 158 | | |
المستخلص
This study lies in three chapters Preceeted by an introduction and followed by a conclusion as follows : - Introduction : It includes the motives for choosing the subject, the most important previow study, chapters of study and finally the syllabus applied. Chapter one :- I tackeld the idioms referring to worshipping. At the beginning of the chapter I loced the term ( worshippers of poetry ) and how critics tackled the term and the implication altogether or the implication only in the case of the term abserce. Idioms referring to worshipping lies in the terminological until which refers to much revision and reiteration of verses and which appeared in these. Terms :- Revision, Rectification, Testing, Instruction, Clearance, Purification and silting so as to show the linguistic reference for the term to know how for it is connected with the terminological indication and to know the most powerful terminological unity referring to affectation which is divided into general and specific indication Chapter two :- poets thought to be worshippers in modern and ancient criticism. I started this chapter with showing out the characteristics of worshipping with zuhair and al-hateah since the early reference of worshipping. Then I came to the poets who are thought to be worshipping in ancient criticism according to the early poets such as:- Labaid Bin Rabia, Al.Farazdak, Al.Kamit Bin Zid, Al.Turmah Bin Hakim, Marwan Ibn Abi Hafsa, Kulthum Bin Amr Al-Etabi Abou Tammam, Al-Mutanabi and agreat number of scientists who took port in compsing poetry. As for the poets who are thought to worshippers in modern criticism. They are Sweid Bin Kraa, Odai Bin El.Refaa Al.Amli and Al.Akhtal. Chapter three:- worshipping between absolute ness and limitedness. this chapter starts with aprablem aroused by praising and euology an those poets who are thought to be worshippers in old criticism and how canthey be described as worshippers while praising them? And how cam we compromise between the two mathers? In other words, what is the practical implication of worshipping? I made an introduction to this compromise when I made it clear that the judgement with affectation can not be totally absolute when it is erstricted in certain contexts. Conclusion: it includes the general consequnces for the study.