![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract Since the discovery of trichloroetbylene by EnU Fischer in (1864). various attempts Wel’e made to assess Us uses as an anaesthet 10 but it was omy e£fectl vel.y us ed by Hewer (194O)? Hewer and Hadfield 0.941) as dJuriI16 the war Lt was necessary to find a safe nQn-1nfl.SlWIIable agent. It soon became more ,commonly used and tagethel:’ with nitrouB oxide 1’01’ most Bort t:i,.asue 0pe1’at.1ons and plastic s:u:cgery not needing any degree of eniacl.e relaxation~ Given with care and without soda lime it bad very few disadvantages (some arJ.”ytlndasand taohypnea) but no gross after Elffects. With the 1ntroductiono:f fluotbtl.ne 1nU!156)by Jolmstone M.. the us e of tricblol’oetbyl ene started to get: less and less except perbapS as an analges.ic in labour.. This was because of tbe more potenQ;Y o:t tluotha,ne and of the faet tbat it can caas e enough abdollinal relaxation for many lower abdom1nal operations •. :But with increased use and in so.me cases abuae the disadvantages of flUotbane becaae eV:l,.C3ient. The depress ion of r~spiration and bypote.nsion COuld be avoided by propfilr care Gf the dose and careful ~ttent1ous to tbe patient,. but the oeour-r ence of ja’Wld.ioe beoame a big problem.. It oocurred t-boul)h not frequellt·ly rot witbout warn11’l€i and can lead to |