![]() | Only 14 pages are availabe for public view |
Abstract In a prospective controlled comparative study on primary varicocele, 30 patients were treated by laparoscopic ligation (GA) and a similar number was treated by Palomo operation (GB). The two groups were statistically similar regarding the pre-operative variables. Operative results show that open surgery has significantly shorter operative time (40.5 minutes) than the laparoscopic time (65.17 minutes). On the contrary, resumption of the pre-operative life activity was significantly more rapid after laparoscopy 8.04 days versus 12.88 days after conventional surgery. The early post-operative complications were all trivial and without consequences. The incidence is 26.67% (8/30) in the laparoscopic group versus 13.33% (4/30) in the open surgery but without statistical significance. The return of audible intestinal sounds and the hospital stay are rather identical in the two treatment groups. Laparoscopic Varicocelectomy versus Palomo Page 130 --- -- --_ .. -- Ligation of the internal spermatic vein through the laparoscope or by high surgical approach results in progressive significant improvement of the spermatic count and motility. In the GA the pre-operative count was 21.11xl0 6 and it increased to 23.75xlWafter 1.5 month and to 23.63xl06 after 3 month. The motility increased from 33.5% to 40.21% and 40.59% respectively. In GB, the mean baseline count was 17.7xl06 and motility was 36.7%. After 1.5 month, the figures are 21.38xl 06 and 42.75%, and after 3 months the figures are 23.22xlW and 42.95%. CONCLUSION The two techniques, laparoscopic and high open surgery, are effective and safe in the treatment of varicocele. They are comparable and equivalent alternatives. Laparoscopic varicocelectomy is advocated if bilateral ligation is decided. This is a growing advantage since the increase concept of bilateral internal spermatic vein affection as a cause of infertility. Laparoscop;c Varicocelectomy versus Palomo. |