الفهرس 
ابو تمنام
افعال التحويليوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام
 |  | from | 838 |  |  |
| | | from | 838 | | |
المستخلص
Long ago, grammanans tried to discover the sentence properties in
poem and the properties of the leprous sentences. The beginnings of these
trials appear in the first pages of Sibaweh’ s book when he put a chapter
named as a chapter of what may be probable in poetry. He wanted by this
chapter to show that the grammatical rules in poetry permits what is not
permitted in prose.
Thus, the sentence properties III prose differs from that in poetry
allowed. In this way, the grammarians for poetry necessities which are not
permitted in prose. This assures what the grammarians said when they
described as weak, irregular or a necessity as accepted only in poetry but
not permissible in prose.
We wanted to support the correctness of grammarians statements
through language factors without direct agreement not supported by poetry
evidence. This subject get more clearer in the fifth chapter of ”Between
Abu Tammam and grammarians” in which book we mentioned the
irregular, the weak and the necessary in Abu Tammam poetry which
assures what the grammarians stated. Thus, they did not put a new rule
because the situation dictated it: for example removing the connection A
hamza in the beginning of the first or the second half or speech stuffing.
Also joining of 2 A hamzas or removing the interrogative A hamza. Also,
using the pronoun ”In, the demonstrative pronoun warning ”han, using
additional ”Baa, and ”men” in places of no additions, using” Fatha” on
prepositional ”kam” particle, starting ”lam” with a different abolition
particles. Also how he used the word ”Wayl” in a different way to what is
grammatically used and making the demonstrative pronoun works as the Long ago, grammanans tried to discover the sentence properties in
poem and the properties of the leprous sentences. The beginnings of these
trials appear in the first pages of Sibaweh’ s book when he put a chapter
named as a chapter of what may be probable in poetry. He wanted by this
chapter to show that the grammatical rules in poetry permits what is not
permitted in prose.
Thus, the sentence properties III prose differs from that in poetry
allowed. In this way, the grammarians for poetry necessities which are not
permitted in prose. This assures what the grammarians said when they
described as weak, irregular or a necessity as accepted only in poetry but
not permissible in prose.
We wanted to support the correctness of grammarians statements
through language factors without direct agreement not supported by poetry
evidence. This subject get more clearer in the fifth chapter of ”Between
Abu Tammam and grammarians” in which book we mentioned the
irregular, the weak and the necessary in Abu Tammam poetry which
assures what the grammarians stated. Thus, they did not put a new rule
because the situation dictated it: for example removing the connection A
hamza in the beginning of the first or the second half or speech stuffing.
Also joining of 2 A hamzas or removing the interrogative A hamza. Also,
using the pronoun ”In, the demonstrative pronoun warning ”han, using
additional ”Baa, and ”men” in places of no additions, using” Fatha” on
prepositional ”kam” particle, starting ”lam” with a different abolition
particles. Also how he used the word ”Wayl” in a different way to what is grammatically used and making the demonstrative pronoun works as the