Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
اثر استخدام بعض طرق التدريس على التحصيل الدراسى فى مادة العلوم لدى تلاميذ مختلفى الذكاء بالحلقة الثانية من التعليم الاساسى /
الناشر
رضا عبد القادر عبد الفتاح درويش ،
المؤلف
درويش، رضا عبد القادر عبد الفتاح
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / رضا عبد القادر عبد الفتاح درويش
مشرف / حمدى ابو الفتوح عطيفة،
مناقش / فايز محمد عبده
مناقش / حمدى ابو الفتوح عطيفة،
الموضوع
المناهج تطوير.
تاريخ النشر
1988 . م
عدد الصفحات
288ص. :
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
ماجستير
التخصص
التعليم
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/1988
مكان الإجازة
جامعة بنها - كلية التربية عام - مناهج وطرق التدريس
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 478

from 478

المستخلص

fhis study aims- at answer-ine; the folloViing ma Ln ques td on :
Does the second cycle of the Basic educat Lon pupils achievement
in science subject differ according to the difference
in the level of intelltgence and method of teaching used?
This question may be divided to the followine questions :
1) Waat is the effect of the dif~erence of intelligence level
on the pupils school achievement in science subject?
2) What is the effect of the difference in the method of teuching
used on the pupils school achievement in science subject?
J) What. is the .effect of the difference in both the intelligence
level and method of teachinG on pupils school achieve--
ment?
~.The
1-
2- There are no slgr;LU lca.nt .d1~e9 ill the pupils school
achievement usin~ the tradl tional J the laboratory and th8
progrommedinstruction aetla.od.
3-
5-
i,-
:.~
6- There are no ~ificant differences in the school achievement
of the pupilS of loWintelligence standard in the
tnr~e metnods•
7- There fire no oit:nificllnt dlfferenc”. in til” ocll.ol nclliev
e
-
ment Q! the pupilS of the mediumintellicence standard usinG
the three methods.
8- There are no sienificant differences Ln the scnool achievement.
of the pupilS or the high intelleCance standard wing
the tnree methods.
9- There is no signific~t interuction bet~wecnlevel of intelligence
and metnod of teuchin:; in thei .•. effect on the sch-
001 achieve;nent in science subject.
’~h.~ fj.r~ ..S.W’ie (the·’E!’”!f1p:f:-.sta~e):
”. Cn~ing the inst):’uctionnl uni,t and u.nnlYsing its content
B.
Preparing the study tuols which contain:
1.
:preparing the tet..tcb,er’s nandbook usiJl[; tne l::~boratory
Ilethod•
~ari.ng the unJ,t subjects using the prograa’•:••d unJ,t.
! 2.
J. Preparing tn, ach1~v~ent test.
c. c_at ,. ..j;h.e’S1;~~7SP~:~.;
!flW--study ~ie containS 23S pupilS represent 6 school
c~QII.es. tw., q,l.”.UI ’for each method.
j
~he Blcgr~ sfli~~ ..Wld wo.> ennta1n.s :
t~~·· .•. -. ~ 1. Appl.ylilg ;’’thepre .• t.
..’ ~.
2. ~;-~~~ec ••
:;~ ”lying’iDe post-test.
>’.,-.
\,.
l
nnd inter retutin~ reoults
1. The variance analysis style among the three eroups.
2. The variance analysis style for tV/O variables using 3xJ
system.
3. Using T. test to know the sienificance of the differences
among the pupilS’ crades.
The study results:
1- There are significant differences in the SCll00l achievement
of the pupils who dtiffel~ in their standu.rd of intelliGence
in favom of hi[)lt medium then low level of inment
usinCthe three methods of tc~chins traditional,
10.boratory and proernmnlcd instructi 011 in fH.vom of the
laboratory .:lethod,the progre.;n.lleidn;Jtruction :.lethodthen
\,
\
teilicence•
There are siVliciant differences in t e pupils Hchievethe
traditional me}hod.
\
I
ment of the pupils who differ in their level of intelli-
.:?;enceusi.n.g, the traditional method in fa.o.:!. of high level,
medium level then low level.
J- There are significant dirieren~cs L~ the school aciueve-
4- There are significant differences in the school ~chievement
among the pupils who differ in their level of iLltelligellce
usin.3 the lc.borr.tO’¥!.Y ;~18tho<lin f£.vo:nof hien,
medium, then low level of si~ificancc.
r
I
\
\\
5- There ~re significant diffcrrence~ in ~he school achieva-
=.ent of the pupils VIao di.tfer in their level of intelligence
using the progra:mntK1 instruction method in favom.
,\
!
( D) ,
6- There are no significant diffe:ccnces in the school achievement
among the low level of intelligance pupils u~ine the
three methods.
7- There are significant differences In the school achieve~-
ant among the medium level of intelligence using the three
methods in favorn of the laboratory, pro grurnmed ill,!;;truction,
then the traditional method.
8- There are significant differences in the school achievement
among the high level of tntel18Gence using tUG three
methods in ruvom of Lhe l[~borutory method, the pl’oG,ra1lr.1ed
instruction then the traditional method.
9- There is significant interaction between both the method
of teaching and level of intelligence end the pupils’
school achievement in science subject.