![]() | يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام |
المستخلص • Introduction :- ------------ All of us know the importance of laboratories, and the laboratory work in stUdying and teaching science. This is because the laboratory work seeks to achieve many cognitive, psychomotor and affective objectives of teaching science. Some studies maintained the effectiveness of the laboratory and the role of the laboratory work in achieving these objectives. To achieve the importance of laboratories and the laboratory work, their requirements must be provided. Any shortage in any of these requirements hinders the laboratories from achieving the objectives of the laboratory i work. These requirements are determined in facilities, materials, equipment, preparing places, storing and the laboratory safety inclUding safety equipment. Of these requirements, technicians are the most important. The trained laboratory technician is considered one of the most important laboratory requirement to, maintain the laboratory work success and to a~hieve its objectives slhe is the first one responsible for preparing laboratories for laboratory work; preparing materials and the required equipment, preparing alternatives for the unprovided equi~nt, besides, participating the teacher in preforming many difficult laboratory activities. --- ---------- --------~--_....-..-.p -. \. - 2 - Furthermore, slhe is responsible for the laboratory safety and those with him beside many functions and technical roles that greatly affect succeeding the laboratory work. Consequently, the laboratory technician should be well prepared before joining his work, and in service through training him continually in the basic technical aspects and the new ares in the field. Some studies referred to a limitation in the system of preparing those pre-service technicians, and, also, in their in-service trai~ing system. This resulted in lowering their performance level in the necessary technical aspect for administrating laboratories and the laboratory work. This needs an interest to raise the level of those technicians in these aspects through pre-service qualification and in-service continuous training. Research problem :- The problem of the study is determined in the lowering level of science laboratory technicians as for technical competencies necessary for preforming the various tasks of the laboratory work. It is also determined in the shortage of in-service training programs and in their weakness in providing for these competencies. To solve this problem, the following questions should be answered :- - 3 - 1) What are the most important technical competencies required by the science laboratory technicians at the general education schools? 2) How can these competencies be improved among a sample of those technicians? 3) What is the extent of self instruction effectiveness in improving technical competencies in their cognitive and psychomotor domains? Research Hypothesis :- ------------------- 1- There are significant statistical differences between the sampl’s mean scores in the pre-evaluation and their mean scores in the post-evaluation in favour of the postevaluation. In terms of this hypothesis, there are two SUb-hypothesis as follows :- A- There are. significant statistical differences between the mean score of the sample in the pre-evaluation of the technical competencies. B- There are significant statistical differences between the mean score of the sample in the pre-evaluation and theirs in the post evaluation in favour of the post evaluation as for the psychomotor domain of the technical competencies. 2- There is a significant positive correlation between the sampl’s scores in the cognitive domain and theirs in the psychomotor one of technical competencies in both of the pre-and post-evaluation. - 4 - -~-~--”-~”-”I--” 1 Research procedures :- To answer the research questions, the following procedures are followed :- 1- Determining the most important technical competencies I J necessary for the laboratory technicians, through :- A- Preparing ~ list of the required technical competencies for the science laboratory technicians, in the light of the following sources. (1) Theoretical study of the laboratory nature and the requirements of the laboratory work. (2) Reviewing previous studies that dealt with laboratories, their technicians and their results of these studies. (3) Analyzing the technical roles of the science laboratory technicians. (4) Recognizing points of view of those specialists in the field of laboratories and science. B- Judging the list by presenting it to a large number of those specialists in laboratories science teachers, and laboratory technicians so as to determine the importance of each competency and to arrange these ones according to their importance. c- Classifying the competency list into three ranks, through ratio weight for each one and choosing the most important competencies that have got the first rank. /” I ------------_-.:....._----_# - 5 - 2- Enhancing the chosen technical competencies, through :- A- Designing self-instruction modules for the chosen competencies as tollows :- ( 1) Determining the objectives of the modules. (2) Determining the topics for each module. (3) Determining the basic components of modules. (4) Validating the modules by presenting them to a Jury and through pre-experiment application. (5) Putting the modules in their final form for field application. B- Preparing. pre-post evaluation tools of the technical competencies in their cognitive and psychomotor domains as follows :- (1) Preparing a test in the cognitive domain of the chosen technical competencies. (2) Preparing a checklist for the psychomotor domain for these competencies. 3- Choosing a random sample of the science laboratory technicians working at the general education schools. 4- Conducting the pre-evaluation tools i.e. [The test and the checklist] on the sample. S- Training the sample on the chosen technical competencies through the ,use of the prepared self-instruction modules. 6- Conducting the evaluation tools after studying the modules by the sample. 7- Listing the results and treating thea statistically. - 6 - CONCLUSION :- The research ha~ revealed the following results :- 1- There are statistically significant differences between the mean scores of the sample in the pre-evaluation’ and theirs in the post-evaluation in favour of the postevaluation. This is in the technical competencies with their cognitive and psychomotor domains.’ It is significant at the level 0.01. This indicates that these differences are not due to chance, but to the study of the modules. 2- Self-instruction modules proved to be effective in the training of in-service science laboratory technicians so as to acquire cognitive and psychomotor technical competencies. As the sample studied these modules, their level of technical competencies has developed. This means that these modules are effective in improving these technical competencies. 3- There is a significant positive correlation at the level 0.01 between the subjects scores in the cognitive domain and theirs in the psychomotor domain of the technical competencies in,both pre-evaluation and post one. This does not mean a cause and effect relation, but it indicates that the change in the psychomotor doaain of the technical competenci.. is related to the change in the cognitive domain of these competencies. |