Search In this Thesis
   Search In this Thesis  
العنوان
دور القاضي الاداري فى المنازعة الإدارية :
المؤلف
الغرشة، مسعود فرج محمد.
هيئة الاعداد
باحث / مسعود فرج محمد الغرشة
مشرف / وليد محمد الشناوى
مناقش / أميرة عبدالله بدر
مناقش / عبدالكريم محمد السروى
الموضوع
المنازعات الإدارية. القانون الإداري. العقود الإدارية.
تاريخ النشر
2022.
عدد الصفحات
مصدر الكترونى (533 صفحة) :
اللغة
العربية
الدرجة
الدكتوراه
التخصص
قانون
تاريخ الإجازة
1/1/2022
مكان الإجازة
جامعة المنصورة - كلية الحقوق - القانون العام
الفهرس
يوجد فقط 14 صفحة متاحة للعرض العام

from 533

from 533

المستخلص

It is recognized in the modern era that power is no longer as it was in ancient societies as the means for enforcing and defending rights; This is for the intervention of the state, and the solution of social and economic disputes that arise between members of society, it is recently established that the state has taken upon itself the duty to establish justice among its citizens through its organs established by virtue of the constitution, which is the cornerstone of building the legal state, it is the basic rule on which the system is based. The law of any state, which determines the state’s authorities and defines its powers. Accordingly, the modern state needs a legislative authority that enacts laws, an executive authority that puts these laws into practice, and an authority that decides on disputes arising from the application of those laws, represented by the judicial authority, which has an imperative necessity in the life of a democratic state, and the judiciary derives its necessity in the state from the necessity of The existence of legal rules that govern the behavior of individuals in society. Instead of a person requiring his own right, and spreading chaos and instability in all areas, the state itself undertakes the task of monitoring the application of laws through the judicial authority, but due to the diversity of interests subject to judicial protection, the state does not seek a judicial organization of a kind Rather, it relies on an administrative judiciary that specializes in adjudicating administrative disputes arising from the administration’s actions to verify the extent of its legitimacy and compliance with the provisions of the law, which is termed idiomatically the principle of legality, and based on that, this principle is in fact linked to the oversight of the management’s work with an inseparable bond; This is to ensure that their work is carried out and carried out within the framework of the law. The law, according to the concept of the modern state, is the one that should prevail and govern all legal relations, so that all those in the state, rulers and ruled, adhere to the legal rules and not violate them; Because it is in violation of the principle of legality. Jurisprudence, the judiciary, and modern legal regulations have settled on many methods of controlling the legality of the legal acts of the administration to verify compliance with the principle of legality. for illegal administrative decisions.