الفهرس 
IntroductionOnly 14 pages are availabe for public view
 |  | from | 174 |  |  |
| | | from | 174 | | |
Abstract
This research presents Cliamsmanship is now routinely practiced by both owners and contractors, it is on longer the domain of only claim <U+2013> minded contractors or specialty construction claims consultants. In some ways, cliamsmanship is starting to find ways to help resolve the numerous disputes that are bound to arise in an industry as complex as construction. It is very sad that the situation has been reached where it can even be suggested of a great industry, as it has been, that efficiency in the pursuit of payment pays better than efficiency in site work. This problem should not be represented as a conflict between the interests of contractors and the interests of owner. Neither side the industry benefits. Contractors do not make more profit overall, because competition ensures that in seeking contracts they allow in their starting prices for the money to be earned at the end in claims. The Dispute prevention and Resolution Task Force of the Construction Industry Institute (CII) at U.S.A has adopted a two pronged approach to contract dispute prevention and resolution. This approach proposes that the contracting parties ?start right? and ?stay right?. ?Start right? requires that the contracting parties start with suitable contract language and with appropriate alternative dispute resolution (ADR) procedure. ?stay right ? requires that the parties solve emerging disputes quickly, before they develop into complex legal problems . The suggested guide model proposed by the author is intended to achieve this objective. Further more, the suggested guide model can aid the contract parties in predicting the likelihood of disputes through the observations contained in this model. Thus the suggested guide model <U+2013> proposed by the author plays the two roles : disputes prediction to start right and disputes resolution / prevention to stay right.